But it isn't the media that said that, it was his buddy on Forcillo’s Gym website that they were both a part of. It has since been taken down, you know, so the mdedia and the public dont use that as an excuse to turn this guy into the world's biggest monster.
So now all of a sudden it's a lie?
never read a Toronto Star article without questioning the spin
that article was shameful because it implies that Forcillo recently put on 80 pounds of muscle and is a frothing roid-raging freak
lets do some math
1) Forcillo is 31 years old
2) the quotes from that old gym website state the year was 1999 and he was in grade 12
3) 1999 was 14 years ago.....so Forcillo was 17 years old while claiming being 220 lbs 12%BF and benching 425
4) the claims on the site said he put on 80lbs in 2 years
5) so he put on 80lbs from the age of 15 - 17
the Star and the author have serious credibility issues publiishing that article the was it was written...but what else is new
I have no problem believing that a 15 year old kid who spends countless hours pushing weights while eating just about everything in sight can put on 80 lbs in 2 years....not only is he developing muscle...but he's also still growing....for all we know Forcillio was 5'5" at 15 years of age and grew to 6'0" by the age of 17
the claims of 80lbs of pure muscle, 12% body fat and 425 bench coming from the keyboard of a 17 year old kid should be taken with about as much credibilty of the Toronto Star article
the Star is doing it's job by questioning why this guy unloaded his clip into that kid (and imo...if you don't wanna get filled by a cop's gun...leave your junk in your pants, your knife at home and don't terrorize a street car full of people)....but for the author to stretch 14 year old claims by a 17 year old into current roid rage by a 31 year old man who obviously isn't spending much time in the gym anymore is just reckless tabloid crap
