No, Sonny would punish him for doing the wrong thing. 
Toronto Cop James Forcillo may have been on steroids
- Thread starter SONIC
- Start date
Thanks - couldn't be bothered 'fighting' with SONIC over basic reading comprehension.
Hahah true! Then scrap
No, Sonny would punish him for doing the wrong thing.
You mean not shooting more and then raping the corpse?
various driving/heavy equipment jobs, I know when my cousin was working on the oil rigs they had random drug tests and another cousin's husband had to pee in order to drive.
oilycreek
Banned
Your 1st example is American, not relevant.
Your 2nd example is about the TTC approving PLANS to implement alcohol and drug testing, but nothing about ACTUAL implementation. Here's a document I found online;
http://www.ttc.ca/About_the_TTC/Com...upplementary_Reports/Fitness_For_Duty_Pol.pdf
The final paragraph in the above document reads;
Doing a Google search finds no hits newer than the week following the above announcement (Oct 19th, 2011) so I'm thinking that it's still not in place.
Your 3rd example is about 2 cases supporting the testing, not of it actually being able to be conducted and goes further to start describing the hurdles that are preventing it.
ThunderPants
Member
Interestingly nothing much would have come of this case if it had not been videoed by a bystander. Shooting the guy 10 times does not make any sense. If he had to shoot, why not just once in the leg or arm?
No need to exaggerate for effect (9 times, not all hits) and the Hollywood angle has been discussed ad nauseum.
Roomie
Banned
Because you would have walked on the street car and disarmed the skinny teenager in seconds right? Sorry but that's not how police are trained and for good reason.
Sent from my commodore 64 on dial up
ajaxguy
Well-known member
You do not know what I would have done... trained or not .... if it was me then yes I would have tried to disarm him, but I do not have a cops mentality.
Type17
Well-known member
Lol just take him out on a date already.
Anyway, article is a bunch of bull. Big deal... 2 high school idiots think one of them gained 80lbs of pure muscle in 2 yrs.
Last edited:
I once worked with a guy who admitted he did juice to bulk. Dude told me one of the the side effects was his shortened temper, said if anyone just looked at him the wrong way at the bus stop he'd feel like starting a fight.
Just thought I'd quickly chime in.
While random workplace drug testing in Canada has been deemed illegal by the courts it does not mean that there can't be drug testing in the workplace. The key word is "random".
If someone works in a safety critical position which means a zero tolerance policy for drugs and alchohol. And zero means absolutely zero amounts in your system, blow over by even a single decimal point or test positive for anything and you're done, immediate dismissal.
How can you be caught if there is no random testing you might ask?
Well in one of 3 ways. First of all as someone in a safety critical position the government mandates that you must be in possession of a fitness to work certificate which includes undergoing a full medical at a every 3 years to 5 years depending on your age and if you have any underlying medical condition that could pose a risk. This medical includes drug test.
Second way is if you're involved in any incident or accident, screw up and that gives the company immediate grounds for a drug and alcohol test.
Third is based on probable grounds, and this is more or less the closest to random testing, and how it works is you walk in and a supervisor or manager observes you and you seem to be staggering a little, your eyes are red or glassy, he engages you in a conversation and notices your speech is slurred. Guess what this in itself does not allow him to test you, however he can go get a second supervisor or manager and the second person will now make his own assessment and if also believes you may be impaired that now gives the company grounds to test you. This is done to prevent abuse of power by a single individual that may be power tripping and has a bone to pick with you.
Anyhow, the above apply to anyone working a safety critical or safety sensitive position, however the company still has to ensure that they have a clearly spelled out d&a policy and that the employee reads and understands said policy.
I'm not here to debate whether said cop above should have been tested or even if the roids played a role, not here to discuss his innocence or guilt, that's for the courts to decide. I'm just trying to shine some light on the testing issue itself. Could he have been tested? well yes, provided Police Officer is a safety Critical job (not sure if they fall under said category although I would imagine it would) and second that the TPS has a zero tolerance policy and that it is clearly spelled out and understood by the employees.
Also, I only have experience with safety critical jobs and that's only thing the above apply to, I don't know if the probable grounds and incident testing could be applied legally to non safety critical jobs like a desk jockey at a downtown bank for example. (nothing against bankers btw)
Cheers!
Last edited:
I hope the guy goes to jail, but the Toronto Star is stretching it a bit in there. They sound like Fox news, make a completely false and irrelevant statement but put the question mark at the end instead of an exclamation, so they imply something false without getting in trouble. Piss *** poor journalism
OilCreek and Soony should get a room
OilCreek and Soony should get a room
Last edited:
oilycreek
Banned
You're just jealous no one is paying attention to you.
Sent from my SGH-I727R using Tapatalk HD
Since I had not posted on this thread yet, that statement is accurate, but now that I have, you just quoted me, contradicting your own statement.
Don't you have some old lady that left the stove on type of emergency to attend to?
