If you want to put a tinfoil hat on, government can make some stupid argument about gold that immediately causes you huge issues converting what you have into something useful.Is gold making a comeback, IF it's purity can be trusted?
If you want to put a tinfoil hat on, government can make some stupid argument about gold that immediately causes you huge issues converting what you have into something useful.Is gold making a comeback, IF it's purity can be trusted?
A gram of gold is worth about $150 or ten Big Mac combos. What kind of scale and file does one carry to mete out the correct amount from a one ounce bar? Don't sneeze.If you want to put a tinfoil hat on, government can make some stupid argument about gold that immediately causes you huge issues converting what you have into something useful.
They asked me if we're still interested and I point blank told them...Houses around me average two point four million , towns are one point two . I would not want the mortgage on any of them , but I’m in the minority. Place across the street went for two point eight . I like the numbers but I don’t see the value .
Sent from my iPhone using GTAMotorcycle.com
The killer is what you will get for yours. I'm in the sell first camp, knowing what I have in my pocket. The downside is hopefully finding what I want for what's in my pockets.My friends are about to list their house for 1.8M and think they’ll sell in a jiffy…
I kept my mouth shut as there are nicer houses for less money standing for months…and they felt offering their house to me for 1.85M was a steal as that’s what they were expecting after commissions.
I may toss in an offer when it languishes on the market for a few months.
Still bargains in northern Ontario. I’m finishing up a 850sq’ flip in Timmins. Bought for $38 (land value, wrecked by squatters). Gutted, $20k materials, $20k in labor and it’s like new.My boat crew guy just bought his first house , Aldershot , he’s twenty nine and getting married next yr . I said geez , good start in a nice neighborhood . Turns out he and his brother own two rentals in Sault St Marie . He did a spread sheet of where rentals are underserved and consistent and hit on SSM . He bought at twenty one and paid just about one hundred k per house , has had long term renters in both houses.
I mentioned he seemed smarter than I thought , he laughed and said “ I crew on your race boat, your the dumdum that owns boats instead of rental property “ . I couldn’t argue .
Sent from my iPhone using GTAMotorcycle.com
Maybe. Also issues with capital. My guess is MM bypassed the banks and self-financed much of this project. Banks don't like to finance crack houses. Once it's complete, they are happy to loan money for a conventional property. Now, if labourer proved to be good and reliable, MM could help labourer finance future flips. Maybe even a vtb mortgage to keep the pressure on as screwing up a flip could result in the loss of your house.Why doesn't the laborer find his own he can buy for 40k and fix it up himself to save six figures? Not readily available?
You got it. For a project like this you need $100k in cash as you can’t finance a condemned property (the crackheads cut out the wiring and plumbing fur scrap metal, the also burned the kitchen doors and trim in a camp stove for heat).Maybe. Also issues with capital. My guess is MM bypassed the banks and self-financed much of this project. Banks don't like to finance crack houses. Once it's complete, they are happy to loan money for a conventional property. Now, if labourer proved to be good and reliable, MM could help labourer finance future flips. Maybe even a vtb mortgage to keep the pressure on as screwing up a flip could result in the loss of your house.
I’m doing these in Timmins. A starter home is $180-250 in decent condition. That rents for $2k/mo.I’m amazed how in an area where you can buy a ninety nine k house anyone is renting but you never know the other guys circumstances. When I bought a house in rural Arizona and paid one fifteen thousand cash the real estate agent was stunned , she hadn’t seen any body do that . It wouldn’t buy a single car garage here . Every one has a different bar to jump over .
Sent from my iPhone using GTAMotorcycle.com
$40k deals aren’t hanging on trees - usually mortgage foreclosures repos or shot-in-the-dark tax sales (I don’t touch the latter).Why doesn't the laborer find his own he can buy for 40k and fix it up himself to save six figures? Not readily available?
The core issue is the building may be (or is) in a floodplain and---according to the article---the local conservation authority is very slow to respond due to internal issues. The conservation authority likely controls the floodplain there--not the city.A guy in north bay buys an old church and plans to divide it into dwellings for his kids. Church has been there for almost 40 years with no issues. Endless string of bureaucratic studies, permits and fees ensue. The biggest obstacle is conservation authority says he needs to raise the slab on grade floor with in-floor heating as current regs require it to be higher. Wtaf. Bill 5 will be used for a lot of evil but it will also stop some of this outrageous behaviour. The structure exists and has for 40 years. He wants to change interior partitions. F off conservation authority.
![]()
Retired dad’s plan to convert church into home hits bureaucratic wall
'No wonder there is a housing shortage,' says frustrated North Bay resident, who's spent months navigating endless maze of permitswww.barrietoday.com
I have no problem with CA identifying that building is on a floodplain, nor any problem with difficulty getting insurance after that notification. That's the owners problem for failing to conduct due diligence. Once the building is up, I think conservation authority should have little authority other than duty to notify. This is very unlikely to be life safety, this is protecting a fifedom. Raising a building that has existed for decades for a theoretical flood based on maps that are largely BS is insane. It also has no effect on conservation.The core issue is the building may be (or is) in a floodplain and---according to the article---the local conservation authority is very slow to respond due to internal issues. The conservation authority likely controls the floodplain there--not the city.
It is not uncommon to have buildings built in a floodplain. There are lots of examples, they may have been built before the area was declared a floodplain (this could even be a house). They may have been built with permission because the original purpose did not include housing or was somehow otherwise exempt. If for example you own a house in a floodplain, it is typically grandfathered but like anything with codes, any major reno requires the building to be brought up to new codes--and good luck getting permission. Not much different than say a fire code, he has to bring it up to current standards, doesn't matter it has not burned down in 40 years...
On the flip side, 100 year flood comes and he will be crying why did they let me build here, or the person he sells it to... The likely solutions are a hard no or a cut and fill on the property which yes may require the structure to be raised on top of the fill to protect it. I read it as he did not do his homework before buying and is now crying, what should have been buyer beware. Can't say for North Bay but as an example the TRCA has online maps...