The nanny state is strong in this thread.
most stupidest?
The nanny state is strong in this thread.
The real question is "how many passengers?"
I would like to vote this the most useless thread of the century.
What kind of person would not only put one kid at risk on his motorcycle, but put two kids at risk?
Don't get me wrong. My boys were on my bike as soon as they could touch the pegs.
Even the thought of putting two kids on your bike, shows a complete disregard for the safety of children.
Then going through the thought process of figgering out how to do it goes beyond belief.
There are laws to keep people safe.
Now you want to break a law, and put kids at risk. OMG
anyway , in my google research... I couldn't find any evidence that children are at risk on a motorcycle...
http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/motorvehiclesafety/tp-tp2436-rs201002-1067.htm
A school bus? You started this thread with the mention of a 3 year old.A 3 year old is not much more than a toddler!
well,, 3yr 9mths.. already riding dirt on their own...
so,,, to put everyone at ease.. instead of putting 2 kids on one bike... I will ride with one , and the wife will ride with the other.
So,, legally? , in Canada?.. how many riders can be on a bike on the road?. And what age is legal?.
I know it is socially acceptable right now to have only one passenger.. but i wonder if I met the legal requirements of the HTA... would a cop still have grounds for some other charge?
Yea I think the police would be inclined to agree. What ever the charge they would lay against you for the hta violation would be for having a the 3 year old on the front there might also be a child endangerment charge. Op I suggest you stick to the letter of the law on this one.