daught
Well-known member
You might get 10 dB improvement at best (impact sounds half as loud). Resilient channels above the drywall would be cheaper with a bigger improvement but obviously that would suck to do with tenants already there. I'd probably go with QT4010 if I was doing it on top and didn't have much height. Sonopanx or QT will both be better than the thin foam crap they pretend is IIC70. For footfalls, weight and deflection are your friends. If you want to make a huge difference, float Gypcrete over a resilient layer and it will be magically better but it will cost you a few inches and most people are unwilling/unable to give up that much height.
Normally ceiling board would go up before wall and that gap would be a labyrinth from above. You could lay a drywall scab over the gap and or acoustic cauking that would block the path. It would require cutting a strip from subfloor to get access to every cavity though and then put the strip back sealed with acoustic caulking (which makes a hell of a mess).
Insulation doesn't need to completely fill every cavity. 90% is good enough. It's not ideal to have gaps like your picture but assuming that each joist cavity is mostly filled, I wouldn't waste a ton of time and money trying to get to 100%. You could drill some holes and blow in insulation. That would help and be minimally annoying but it's up to you.
Looks like qt 4010 needs thinset on top but you can install flooring directly on top of 4005? Am I reading the specs correctly?
