Another one-Georgia school shooter released alongside image of him posing with AK-47

Because there's never any shootings in states where they have carry laws.......oh wait....

And you're saying there's no mass killings where firearms are heavily regulated?

The way I see it there is no way you can ban guns in America. How would you propose you fix the condition in the US now?
 
Except that statement holds true for such mentality with any tool. It's the mentality part that is the issue, not the tool.

...and with that mentality the tool becomes more dangerous. Faced with a nutter my "apprehension quotient" would be like this:

1. Nutter with a rock......not too bad depending on distance.
2. Nutter with a knife....a bit worse to very bad depending on distance.
3. Nutter with a gun.....****.
 
And you're saying there's no mass killings where firearms are heavily regulated?

The way I see it there is no way you can ban guns in America. How would you propose you fix the condition in the US now?


Have you seen the general stupidity that is not prevalent in the US?
They are getter dumber and dumber equates to fear which is what they live in.
Listen and watch, you will see or hear fear being projected into most things now.
There is no fixing. There is WAY too much big money involved. Nobody is going to give that up in the US.
Presidents shot and killed - check
Mass shootings- check
Mass shootings in schools - check
Response - get more guns and arm every teacher

Nothing will change in the US unless they have another civil war - half check underway with the Political system.

There is another giant industry that relies on these crimes and issues. The Prison Industrial Complex.
 
...and with that mentality the tool becomes more dangerous. Faced with a nutter my "apprehension quotient" would be like this:

1. Nutter with a rock......not too bad depending on distance.
2. Nutter with a knife....a bit worse to very bad depending on distance.
3. Nutter with a gun.....****.

How bout a nutter with gasoline, a car, 18 wheeler, airplane, etc etc etc ???

Delete the nutter in all 3 of your examples and you have nothing but inanimate objects.

Let me ask a more direct question, do you believe in "gun control"?
 
That's just going to attract nutters that like a challenge.

Except, not. These guys almost universally strike gun-free zones. Malls, colleges, schools, theaters, etc. They wanna kill easy targets, not play rambo against cops.
 
Except, not. These guys almost universally strike gun-free zones. Malls, colleges, schools, theaters, etc. They wanna kill easy targets, not play rambo against cops.

Furthermore, when met with resistance they almost always commit suicide because they are nothing but cowards.
 
How bout a nutter with gasoline, a car, 18 wheeler, airplane, etc etc etc ???

Delete the nutter in all 3 of your examples and you have nothing but inanimate objects.

Let me ask a more direct question, do you believe in "gun control"?

Yes. I firmly believe nutters shouldn't have guns. Don't you?

You are absolutely correct...without the nutters (anyone) they are inanimate objects but that argument is ridiculous. Do guns fire themselves? Do chemical weapons self-disperse? And does that make them any less lethal?

Here, I'll help you, I think that people that want to carry guns in everyday life in North America are quite paranoid. I tend not to hang around paranoid people and generally don't trust them. Paranoia is often the first step to fully fledged nutterism don't you agree?

I've been to places in Central America where everyone carried a gun but they had just come out of civil wars or nationwide skirmishes with narco-terrorists. That was understandeable and there was a totally different attitude to weapons there. Switzerland...heavily armed populace but all males have had military training... and a totally different attitude to weapons again. Never had a problem in Switzerland.

Tell me...do we have the same problems, same magnitude here as El Salvador used to have? Honduras? Columbia? If the answer to that is yes...then congrats, you've just become "the nutter".

Lastly...I'm not afraid of guns, I love guns. I have a marksman qualification from the RAF from years ago to prove it. To be clear...what bothers me is trigger happy paranoid yahoos with guns in public...and to clarify....I'm also bothered by the same yahoos with knifes, rocks or cheese graters...just not to the same extent. However...all this is moot for Canada but pertinent to the US. Right?
 
How bout a nutter with gasoline, a car, 18 wheeler, airplane, etc etc etc ???

Delete the nutter in all 3 of your examples and you have nothing but inanimate objects.

Let me ask a more direct question, do you believe in "gun control"?

To the best of my knowledge I can not recall 20 kids and 6 adults being intentionally killed in 1 shot (no pun intended) with the use of a knife.

On December 14, 2012, 20-year-old Adam Lanza fatally shot twenty children and six adult staff members in a mass murder at Sandy Hook Elementary School in the village of Sandy Hook in Newtown, Connecticu

People are way too paranoid and afraid of just about everything these days.
It's odd given the easy access of information but then again we have are physically becoming fatter and lazier therefore stupid follows.

In a society we do have to put controls on things to protect the masses and as well protect the "weakest".
e.g. Should we allow 12 year girls/boys to have sex with 30 year old men/women?
Should we allow 12 year old girls/boys to enter into legal contracts such as car loans and credit cards?
We had to put limits on how much the general public can drink and drive.

Can you tell me why a civilian requires a firearm that can disperse 100 bullets a minute and to further add why do those bullets have to be armour piercing?
 
Last edited:
"Can you tell me, why does any one require a motorcycle that can go 200+ km/h and become a murderous projectile capable of mass murder?

* bolder letters are media jargon used to instill fear.

Ya see what i did there? Dont you realize that there is someone out there who wants to ban SOMETHING you are doing because they have no need for it and dont understand why you want to do it/have it.

Why do people need dogs? Last xx in xx town i heard of a dog attacking a xx. They are a menace to the society and need to be banned.

Why do people need SUVs? They pollute more and are much more likely to kill or injure the passengers in other vehicles. We need to ban SUVs.

You seriously want me to continue?

In the end, its ****ing hilarious how you, -D-, talk about fear being projected and fear being part of everyday life and how we have no reason to fear and therefore carry firearms and those that do are nutters, when in the same paragraph you project your media fed fear of "assault weapons". If you'd actually stop and do some thorough research you will realize that statistically, shootings with "assault weapons" and mass shootings are an insignificant portion of the overall number. Something like 0.2% of all shootings.

Fact: 80% of shootings are with a handgun with a capacity of 15 or less. Fact, the rest of the shootings are performed with a long gun, with majority being done with a shotgun, followed by a hunting type firearm. Like i said previously, assault rifles, aka semi auto's with magazines bigger than 10 rounds are used so little that any researcher would have dismissed them as a statistical anomaly.

And since you had to go and stick a foot in your mouth by bringing knives into this, statistically in USA more people are killed with knives and other sharp objects than rifles.



To the best of my knowledge I can not recall 20 kids and 6 adults being intentionally killed in 1 shot (no pun intended) with the use of a knife.

On December 14, 2012, 20-year-old Adam Lanza fatally shot twenty children and six adult staff members in a mass murder at Sandy Hook Elementary School in the village of Sandy Hook in Newtown, Connecticu

People are way too paranoid and afraid of just about everything these days.
It's odd given the easy access of information but then again we have are physically becoming fatter and lazier therefore stupid follows.

In a society we do have to put controls on things to protect the masses and as well protect the "weakest".
e.g. Should we allow 12 year girls/boys to have sex with 30 year old men/women?
Should we allow 12 year old girls/boys to enter into legal contracts such as car loans and credit cards?
We had to put limits on how much the general public can drink and drive.

Can you tell me why a civilian requires a firearm that can disperse 100 bullets a minute and to further add why do those bullets have to be armour piercing?
 
"Can you tell me, why does any one require a motorcycle that can go 200+ km/h and become a murderous projectile capable of mass murder?

* bolder letters are media jargon used to instill fear.

Ya see what i did there? Dont you realize that there is someone out there who wants to ban SOMETHING you are doing because they have no need for it and dont understand why you want to do it/have it.

Why do people need dogs? Last xx in xx town i heard of a dog attacking a xx. They are a menace to the society and need to be banned.

Why do people need SUVs? They pollute more and are much more likely to kill or injure the passengers in other vehicles. We need to ban SUVs.

You seriously want me to continue?

In the end, its ****ing hilarious how you, -D-, talk about fear being projected and fear being part of everyday life and how we have no reason to fear and therefore carry firearms and those that do are nutters, when in the same paragraph you project your media fed fear of "assault weapons". If you'd actually stop and do some thorough research you will realize that statistically, shootings with "assault weapons" and mass shootings are an insignificant portion of the overall number. Something like 0.2% of all shootings.

Fact: 80% of shootings are with a handgun with a capacity of 15 or less. Fact, the rest of the shootings are performed with a long gun, with majority being done with a shotgun, followed by a hunting type firearm. Like i said previously, assault rifles, aka semi auto's with magazines bigger than 10 rounds are used so little that any researcher would have dismissed them as a statistical anomaly.

And since you had to go and stick a foot in your mouth by bringing knives into this, statistically in USA more people are killed with knives and other sharp objects than rifles.

Typical, you avoid answering my simple question. I never said there should be no guns. I simply asked why a civilian needs to possess a certain type of gun and ammo. You are kinda sounding like on of those "nutters" that jc100 mentions.
 
Typical, you avoid answering my simple question. I never said there should be no guns. I simply asked why a civilian needs to possess a certain type of gun and ammo. You are kinda sounding like on of those "nutters" that jc100 mentions.

It's quite simple. Because they can. Because there is no law against it. Because the first world doesn't apply "need" to anything you possess. The default argument is why do you need an 82 inch TV?

You don't need 90 per cent of the crap in your house. You just want it and have the means to acquire it.

Why do you, as a Canadian, need to cry about anything and everything. Because you can.
 
Typical, you avoid answering my simple question. I never said there should be no guns. I simply asked why a civilian needs to possess a certain type of gun and ammo. You are kinda sounding like on of those "nutters" that jc100 mentions.

I did answer it to you. Reading comprehension levels so low that unless its spelled out, you cant grasp the content and answer of my post? While on the other hand you didnt answer my questions.

So again i ask you, why do we need motorcycles that can do 200+ km/h if the speed limit is 100?

In the end, you can ***** and moan all you want, USA has their Constitutional Bill of Rights where the right to bear arms is not 10th, 8th or 5ths, but second, right after the right to assemble, free speech and freedom of religion. Second amendment to bear arms follows it on purpose, because without the second amendment the first one is worth as much as the paper it is written on.
 
I did answer it to you. Reading comprehension levels so low that unless its spelled out, you cant grasp the content and answer of my post? While on the other hand you didnt answer my questions.

So again i ask you, why do we need motorcycles that can do 200+ km/h if the speed limit is 100?

In the end, you can ***** and moan all you want, USA has their Constitutional Bill of Rights where the right to bear arms is not 10th, 8th or 5ths, but second, right after the right to assemble, free speech and freedom of religion. Second amendment to bear arms follows it on purpose, because without the second amendment the first one is worth as much as the paper it is written on.

 
You do realize that this conversation encompasses the US as well as evident by the references to their Constitution.
How about you answer the question I posted in bold?

I fully comprehend the scope of our conversation. You are the one who started the reference to the US by referencing Sandy Hook and claiming that
To the best of my knowledge I can not recall 20 kids and 6 adults being intentionally killed in 1 shot (no pun intended) with the use of a knife
.

For the record, Lanza did not kill 20 kids and 6 teachers with "just one shot". Did you know that ironically on the very same day as the Sandy hook massacre that exactly 20 kids were stabbed in a school in China? But I digress......

Now back to your final question/claim in that post. I'm asking you to name one civilian firearm that fits the description/claim you have made. Once you do that I can better answer your question.
 
Back
Top Bottom