sounds like it's time to retire.....
|
|
|
Why Android is better than iPhone.
- Thread starter MotoStark
- Start date
sounds like it's time to retire.....
There was always a big question mark over RIM's innovation strategy. If you remember, even in their heyday they had to pay massive amounts over patent infringement for their technology. If they can't truly develop their own ideas instead of borrowing others then there's not much of a future.
IMHO...... I think they have one last kick at the can before RIM's deathstroke.
Problem with RIM, is they overpromise and underdeliver.
2012 will be fun to watch as it will be make or break for them.
RIM unveils next-generation operating system for BlackBerry
http://www.thespec.com/news/business/article/611067--blackberry-unveils-new-operating-system
Problem with RIM, is they overpromise and underdeliver.
2012 will be fun to watch as it will be make or break for them.
RIM unveils next-generation operating system for BlackBerry
http://www.thespec.com/news/business/article/611067--blackberry-unveils-new-operating-system
Hmmmmm.......
Apple crumble? Q3 results a rare miss for tech giant
http://www.thespec.com/news/busines...crumble-q3-results-a-rare-miss-for-tech-giant
Yes....and before everyone starts blabbing about the "but everyone was waiting for Iphone5" malarkey.........
"iPhone buyers had been holding off and waiting for the new model that was launched last week, after the end of the quarter. Still, analysts expected the older models to keep much of their appeal."
Last edited:
I guess you found out where to buy a vaporizer in Hammy.
iPhone 4S First Weekend Sales Top Four Million
I agree. I had RIM's obituary all figured out but I'm gonna hold back for now because I'm starting to think they have a chance. The big issue for them right now is to scale back for the next year or two. Their best days are behind them for a very long time to come. Like the big 3 in the 70's, RIM just missed the boat and has to regroup and figure itself out and hopefully come back swinging.
The biggest thing that can hurt them right now is the cutthroat index of public opinion when it comes to IT. You're either cutting edge or you're a zero. That's not reality, but that's perception and it can be enough to sink the mighty ship RIM if it doesn't manage it's features and public image properly.
http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2011/10/19/blackberry-work-iphone/?iid=SF_F_LN
"If you want to play Angry Birds, get an iPhone. But if you need to do business, stand by your old friend."
"If you want to play Angry Birds, get an iPhone. But if you need to do business, stand by your old friend."
Written like a true conformist. He runs out and buys a new uniform as soon as someone makes fun of him, runs out and buys a new phone as soon as someone makes fun of someone else, but then can't help himself from making fun of other people.
I don't know who this guy is, and I don't care. If you consider a phone to be "an old friend", it's very likely that you are a loser.
"Stanley Bing is the pen name of Gil Schwartz (born May 20, 1951 in New York, NY), a business humorist and novelist. He has written a column for Fortune magazine for more than ten years, after having spent a decade at Esquire, and has written many books (see below). Schwartz is the executive vice president of corporate communications for CBS."
Poser
Well-known member
Why Apple Bought Siri
Jon Pielak is the former lead iPhone developer for Siri, the voice technology that Apple has implemented in the iPhone 4S. Pielak helped start the Siri project back in 2008.
Some may have forgotten that Siri actually started as a popular App Store app for the iPhone. In a recent blog post, Siri’s former lead developer talks about why Apple bought Siri, what makes Siri special, the what’s on the horizon for the most advanced consumer voice technology on earth…
The original Siri application was begun in early August of 2008. From a development aspect, Siri Assistant was actually an HTML-intensive web experience wrapped in Objective-C code. The web view worked with native elements of iOS to utilize the service’s “VLingo“ backend (where the real magic happened). Believe it or not, Siri didn’t have Nuance as a partner until 2010.
Pielak helped unveil the Siri iPhone app to the world at All Things D’s D7 conference in May 2009. By then, the app was starting to gain traction with the media. Pielak said that, “It was the first time I really got the sense that I was involved with a product that would be used by millions of people.”
Apple ended up buying Siri because of its ability to recognize context. There are plenty of voice assistant technologies on the market, including Google’s ownVoice Actions for Android. Siri separated itself from the competition with its ability to correlate data — Pielak and his team focused on natural language processing.
While some would say that Siri is another Apple flop, Pielak sees a bright future on the horizon. He no longer works on Siri, (the Siri team at Apple is apparently the largest, according to reports) but he has a good idea of where the technology will be taken in the future.
Apple says that Siri is in beta, and more features will be added over time. A highly requested feature is third party app access. Pielak says:
Siri is limited to the iPhone 4S right now, but hackers are already trying to port the technology to other iOS devices. It’s obvious that Apple wants to restrict Siri to the iPhone 4S as a main selling point, but there’s a good chance that Siri access could be opened up to other devices, including the Mac, in the future.
BMW has already said that it wants to integrate Siri with its future automobiles. Imagine a world in which all kinds of hardware and software integrate with Siri. Your Mac becomes controlled by your voice. Your car becomes an extension of what you can do with Siri on your iPhone.
If you think that Siri is only for mobile devices, you’re wrong. This technology, if improved upon, will permeate all aspects of consumer technology. And Apple will be leading the race, again.
That’s the world that Apple imagined when it bought Siri.
And that’s why Siri is here to stay.
Jon Pielak is the former lead iPhone developer for Siri, the voice technology that Apple has implemented in the iPhone 4S. Pielak helped start the Siri project back in 2008.
Some may have forgotten that Siri actually started as a popular App Store app for the iPhone. In a recent blog post, Siri’s former lead developer talks about why Apple bought Siri, what makes Siri special, the what’s on the horizon for the most advanced consumer voice technology on earth…
The original Siri application was begun in early August of 2008. From a development aspect, Siri Assistant was actually an HTML-intensive web experience wrapped in Objective-C code. The web view worked with native elements of iOS to utilize the service’s “VLingo“ backend (where the real magic happened). Believe it or not, Siri didn’t have Nuance as a partner until 2010.
Pielak helped unveil the Siri iPhone app to the world at All Things D’s D7 conference in May 2009. By then, the app was starting to gain traction with the media. Pielak said that, “It was the first time I really got the sense that I was involved with a product that would be used by millions of people.”
Apple ended up buying Siri because of its ability to recognize context. There are plenty of voice assistant technologies on the market, including Google’s ownVoice Actions for Android. Siri separated itself from the competition with its ability to correlate data — Pielak and his team focused on natural language processing.
“Often times reviews on iTunes would comment on how the Siri app seems to do a better job than the Nuance app or Dragon dictate. The iPhone application is just the portal to the brains of Siri running on a bunch of servers. There, it can take a sentence and dissect it naturally. An example might be “Book a table at Il Fornaio in Novi for 7PM” and it determines that “Il Fornaio” is likely the name of a place and “Novi” is likely a location. This is referred to as natural language processing, and it is incredibly difficult to get right.”
According to Pielak, the real magic of Siri is what happens after a voice command is converted to text.
“Tell another system to “Book at table at Il Fornaio at 7:00 with my mom;” the system can no doubt create a calendar entry at 7:00 and might even know who your mom is. It might even be possible for that device to figure out the closest Il Fornaio restaurant. What differentiates the NLP logic in Siri is that it will maintain context so you could say: “Also send her an email reminder.” Siri will understand ‘her’ and compose the email accordingly.
This comprehension of context requires a great deal of logic and processing behind the scenes.”
Siri’s ability to interpret meaning caught the eye of the folks in Cupertino, and Siri needed an established, trusted company like Apple to back its technology. Mass adoption was never going to happen until Siri became a fully integrated part of the operating system.This comprehension of context requires a great deal of logic and processing behind the scenes.”
While some would say that Siri is another Apple flop, Pielak sees a bright future on the horizon. He no longer works on Siri, (the Siri team at Apple is apparently the largest, according to reports) but he has a good idea of where the technology will be taken in the future.
Apple says that Siri is in beta, and more features will be added over time. A highly requested feature is third party app access. Pielak says:
“Intelligence needs to come from many sources. Siri will need to mine collective input from as many data sources as possible in order to grow and stay relevant. Siri can’t be a marketing engine for select partners. True digital assistants have to put the user first, just as the user would do when making a decision on their own. There is enormous potential for Siri to integrate with data sources of many different types. Opening Siri up while ensuring the quality of the data will be a challenge for Apple. However, the recent success with the iOS and Mac App Stores has given Apple an effective way to influence its third part developers.”
In a perfect world, Siri would be able to reserve your movie tickets, tell you the latest game scores, post to social networks, etc. Third party app integration is coming, it just takes time. Yelp and Wolfram Alpha were lucky enough to get in on the Siri action at the beginning. Imagine what will happen when the floodgates open.
BMW has already said that it wants to integrate Siri with its future automobiles. Imagine a world in which all kinds of hardware and software integrate with Siri. Your Mac becomes controlled by your voice. Your car becomes an extension of what you can do with Siri on your iPhone.
If you think that Siri is only for mobile devices, you’re wrong. This technology, if improved upon, will permeate all aspects of consumer technology. And Apple will be leading the race, again.
That’s the world that Apple imagined when it bought Siri.
And that’s why Siri is here to stay.
http://www.idownloadblog.com/2011/10/18/why-apple-bought-siri/
Why Apple Bought Siri
Jon Pielak is the former lead iPhone developer for Siri, the voice technology that Apple has implemented in the iPhone 4S. Pielak helped start the Siri project back in 2008.
Some may have forgotten that Siri actually started as a popular App Store app for the iPhone. In a recent blog post, Siri’s former lead developer talks about why Apple bought Siri, what makes Siri special, the what’s on the horizon for the most advanced consumer voice technology on earth…
The original Siri application was begun in early August of 2008. From a development aspect, Siri Assistant was actually an HTML-intensive web experience wrapped in Objective-C code. The web view worked with native elements of iOS to utilize the service’s “VLingo“ backend (where the real magic happened). Believe it or not, Siri didn’t have Nuance as a partner until 2010.
Pielak helped unveil the Siri iPhone app to the world at All Things D’s D7 conference in May 2009. By then, the app was starting to gain traction with the media. Pielak said that, “It was the first time I really got the sense that I was involved with a product that would be used by millions of people.”
Apple ended up buying Siri because of its ability to recognize context. There are plenty of voice assistant technologies on the market, including Google’s ownVoice Actions for Android. Siri separated itself from the competition with its ability to correlate data — Pielak and his team focused on natural language processing.“Often times reviews on iTunes would comment on how the Siri app seems to do a better job than the Nuance app or Dragon dictate. The iPhone application is just the portal to the brains of Siri running on a bunch of servers. There, it can take a sentence and dissect it naturally. An example might be “Book a table at Il Fornaio in Novi for 7PM” and it determines that “Il Fornaio” is likely the name of a place and “Novi” is likely a location. This is referred to as natural language processing, and it is incredibly difficult to get right.”According to Pielak, the real magic of Siri is what happens after a voice command is converted to text.
“Tell another system to “Book at table at Il Fornaio at 7:00 with my mom;” the system can no doubt create a calendar entry at 7:00 and might even know who your mom is. It might even be possible for that device to figure out the closest Il Fornaio restaurant. What differentiates the NLP logic in Siri is that it will maintain context so you could say: “Also send her an email reminder.” Siri will understand ‘her’ and compose the email accordingly.Siri’s ability to interpret meaning caught the eye of the folks in Cupertino, and Siri needed an established, trusted company like Apple to back its technology. Mass adoption was never going to happen until Siri became a fully integrated part of the operating system.
This comprehension of context requires a great deal of logic and processing behind the scenes.”
While some would say that Siri is another Apple flop, Pielak sees a bright future on the horizon. He no longer works on Siri, (the Siri team at Apple is apparently the largest, according to reports) but he has a good idea of where the technology will be taken in the future.
Apple says that Siri is in beta, and more features will be added over time. A highly requested feature is third party app access. Pielak says:“Intelligence needs to come from many sources. Siri will need to mine collective input from as many data sources as possible in order to grow and stay relevant. Siri can’t be a marketing engine for select partners. True digital assistants have to put the user first, just as the user would do when making a decision on their own. There is enormous potential for Siri to integrate with data sources of many different types. Opening Siri up while ensuring the quality of the data will be a challenge for Apple. However, the recent success with the iOS and Mac App Stores has given Apple an effective way to influence its third part developers.”In a perfect world, Siri would be able to reserve your movie tickets, tell you the latest game scores, post to social networks, etc. Third party app integration is coming, it just takes time. Yelp and Wolfram Alpha were lucky enough to get in on the Siri action at the beginning. Imagine what will happen when the floodgates open.
Siri is limited to the iPhone 4S right now, but hackers are already trying to port the technology to other iOS devices. It’s obvious that Apple wants to restrict Siri to the iPhone 4S as a main selling point, but there’s a good chance that Siri access could be opened up to other devices, including the Mac, in the future.
BMW has already said that it wants to integrate Siri with its future automobiles. Imagine a world in which all kinds of hardware and software integrate with Siri. Your Mac becomes controlled by your voice. Your car becomes an extension of what you can do with Siri on your iPhone.
If you think that Siri is only for mobile devices, you’re wrong. This technology, if improved upon, will permeate all aspects of consumer technology. And Apple will be leading the race, again.
That’s the world that Apple imagined when it bought Siri.
And that’s why Siri is here to stay.
http://www.idownloadblog.com/2011/10/18/why-apple-bought-siri/
Apparently this is the same Siri where a stranger can pick up your iphone and bypass security and ask for contact details etc.
Awesome.
Anyone catch Steven Colbert last night, doing 'his' bit on Siri?
Did a few simple commands. Worked. Then he started doing "his" thing. His last comment to the lady's voice in Siri was **** off.
She had a response - I think that part was embellished........lol
oh, btw - if someone comes up with a phone that can use retina recognition for a password, let me know.
Did a few simple commands. Worked. Then he started doing "his" thing. His last comment to the lady's voice in Siri was **** off.
She had a response - I think that part was embellished........lol
oh, btw - if someone comes up with a phone that can use retina recognition for a password, let me know.
Last edited:
Those figures are hugely inflated by pre-orders from both apple and wireless carriers. It is also boosted by sufficient stock supplied this time to both US and Canada as well as more countries for initial release then just US, Germany and Japan that iPhone4 had in it's first month. I refused to stay in lines and didn't get an iP4 until late October, which was some 3 months after it's launch. Seems like apple is sticking to it's "but it has a compass" update strategy they used with 3Gs. To be fair, there is not that much new technology they can include at this point. Screen is already top notch (can be bigger in size, but PPI is one of the highest), has great camera, great mics and noise cancelling. Compared to top phones for Android lacks just NFC and LTE from the big features.
Yummy
|
|
|
|
|