Did you watch the video carefully and read the comments? Three tests; wet, semi-wet, and dry.
Hard to watch the video when i was reading the article in the newspaper.
Did you watch the video carefully and read the comments? Three tests; wet, semi-wet, and dry.
Hard to watch the video when i was reading the article in the newspaper.
Well you responded to a post about a video. You should watch it.
Yeah i watched it.
Bike was a bmw and had abs brake test in a controlled environment.
Seriously Rob, stop cock blocking for two minutes, i thought this thread was about the new Honda NC700.
Rob, also the Bike to the nine yr older Honda Accord squashes any credibility that video has to offer.
Hmm the wet condition wasn't very wet....
Rob, also the Bike to the nine yr older Honda Accord squashes any credibility that video has to offer.
Instrumented test of a 98 Honda Accord braking from 60-0 is 133ft. A modern 2012 Toyota Camry stops about 6ft shorter. Both stats are instrumented tests from Motor Trend.
Point is, the BMW performs more than adequately with its single front disc.
The braking numbers quoted for the 98 accord were more than likely done in the year 1989.
Try repeating those same numbers 9 years later with wear and tear factor added on, plus who knows that accord in the video could have bald tires, leaking shocks, Canadian tire brakes pads and a furry dice in the windshield.
But big changes come in the form of available features. ABS with a twin-disc setup up front is now standard, and both Electronic Suspension Adjustment (ESA) and Automatic Stability Control (ASC, BMW-speak for traction control) are optional on this bottom-of-the-line middleweight for the first time.
That's cool -
![]()
low seat height but lots of power 75 HP
There will be no comparison - the Honda NC700 just sucks.
But I be the BMW is no lightweight either in lb or price.
Nice ride - be a contender in Aus if the price was right still think a single thumper best for dual sport that really is.