Law Enforcement - The Good, The Bad, The Ugly.....

Who was in the wrong?

  • Cop

    Votes: 23 20.4%
  • Dude who got shot

    Votes: 33 29.2%
  • I like turtles

    Votes: 57 50.4%

  • Total voters
    113
Police were hunting for a dangerous driver in an Audi that was ****** that a santa clause parade was blocking his activities. The driver then drove down a pedestrian path and through the parade. Turns out that driver is a YRP cop. It doesn't sound like they turned themselves in. Loser. Based on their behaviour, in a fair world, she would have her PSA hearing now and get the big stick. Cynical me thinks they used dangerous driving as the charge as it's much easier to beat.

giphy.gif
 
As expected, suspended with pay. So for driving like a complete ahole, taxpayers give her a six figure vacation. This nonsense needs to stop. Adjudicate psa charges asap where sufficient evidence exists. Suspended without pay is the minimum position this one should start at unless they can't get beyond balance of probability that it was her driving.

 
Last edited:
Have you ever heard of a single cop ever getting a 172 charge? Thee but not for me.
Yes, I can remember at least three occasions when it happened. On at least one of them the involved department decided that they would "impound" the police vehicle in their own yard, thereby avoiding having to have the department pay for storage.
 
Last edited:
Another on the job thief suspended with pay. Psa needs to change. They have to have video of this dirtbag accepting the goods and failing to log them. Employment consequences need to happen next week not in two years.

And, as always, the question is how long had he been doing it before getting caught?
 
Kudos to Welland police. No one dead in 24 hour stand off. The officer that was shot only had minor injuries thanks to body armour. Subject arrested.

All the above based on last night' news.

From what I saw on the news clip, the fence dispute was over blocking traffic sight lines and usage of road allowance. IMO the actual positioning of the fence wasn't that big a deal.

However, the news clip didn't allow me time to read what was written on the fence but it appeared to be a tin foil hat manifesto, possibly directed at the political crowd.
 
Last edited:
Kudos to Welland police. No one dead in 24 hour stand off. The officer that was shot only had minor injuries thanks to body armour. Subject arrested.

All the above based on last night' news.

From what I saw on the news clip, the fence dispute was over blocking traffic sight lines and usage of road allowance. IMO the actual positioning of the fence wasn't that big a deal.

However, the news clip didn't allow me time to read what was written on the fence but it appeared to be a tin foil hat manifesto, possible directed at the political crowd.
Words on fence were sovereign state/freeman on the land crap. A conflict was inevitable. Trying to tell society that they have no control over you while living in town is next level insane. At least move out to the country.

Edit:
"Free sovereign independent state of bhudan"
 
Last edited:
Just saw a Global News story on it and a local said that the whole situation should have been de-escalated sooner, before this happened. If the guy with the gun is a SovCit then there was no d-escalating it. Any attempt at enforcement of the bylaws simply results in escalation on the part of SovCits, as they don't consider statutes and bylaws to be "real laws." They usually try to somehow import US talking points into their "legal" objections, no matter where they're actually located. I've seen it from SovCits in Canada and Australia. In the US the SovCit movement has been declared a terrorist organization for years now.

EDIT - Here's the location:

 
Just saw a Global News story on it and a local said that the whole situation should have been de-escalated sooner, before this happened. If the guy with the gun is a SovCit then there was no d-escalating it. Any attempt at enforcement of the bylaws simply results in escalation on the part of SovCits, as they don't consider statutes and bylaws to be "real laws." They usually try to somehow import US talking points into their "legal" objections, no matter where they're actually located. I've seen it from SovCits in Canada and Australia. In the US the SovCit movement has been declared a terrorist organization for years now.

Was at a friend's house yesterday morning 3 streets over from the standoff (took Merrit Rd. across the top of town and south to avoid the area but it had already been de-escalated by then). He's well known in town (infamous) for his quirky behaviour, on the alphabet spectrum (CD), has a running feud with the city and many other locals for various sleights, and had told several of his friends/acquaintances that he wanted to go out via 'suicide by cop'.
 
Just saw a Global News story on it and a local said that the whole situation should have been de-escalated sooner, before this happened. If the guy with the gun is a SovCit then there was no d-escalating it. Any attempt at enforcement of the bylaws simply results in escalation on the part of SovCits, as they don't consider statutes and bylaws to be "real laws." They usually try to somehow import US talking points into their "legal" objections, no matter where they're actually located. I've seen it from SovCits in Canada and Australia. In the US the SovCit movement has been declared a terrorist organization for years now.

EDIT - Here's the location:

I don't see a traffic view problem but maybe the grass roots of a Branch Davidian off shoot.

There seemed to be a lot more creative literature since that photo was taken.

Mathematics is a big part of the solution.

To the SovCit, show me a mathematical model that shows how things would work out if there wasn't some form of governmental control.

To the rest of us, show me a mathematical model that shows how things will work out with the present form of governmental control.

We're screwed
 
Last edited:
I don't see a traffic view problem but maybe the grass roots of a Branch Davidian off shoot.

There seemed to be a lot more creative literature since that photo was taken.
I was rather surprised to see that view is from July of this year.
 
Just saw a Global News story on it and a local said that the whole situation should have been de-escalated sooner, before this happened. If the guy with the gun is a SovCit then there was no d-escalating it. Any attempt at enforcement of the bylaws simply results in escalation on the part of SovCits, as they don't consider statutes and bylaws to be "real laws." They usually try to somehow import US talking points into their "legal" objections, no matter where they're actually located. I've seen it from SovCits in Canada and Australia. In the US the SovCit movement has been declared a terrorist organization for years now.

EDIT - Here's the location:


House kitty corner about (80 yds.) on the corner of Third St. + Plymouth Rd.

AP1GczPcVB5mf1UTmK9YIWdZddq7x8H0i9osCmRoJjHk6e6OEcHOwp1HOTlvY89m5JQd0LRY7ieCqmQjT05lHKz7kXMT8NBB7nSogUnPWj3lDtVaTMlYZ-99DFJ5Iv020tnXJ8LSTAIjXHGKi0T2i5qqDKt5Yw=w1514-h882-s-no-gm


Video from the front porch of that house showing the police returning fire at the onset of hostilities.

 
House kitty corner about (80 yds.) on the corner of Third St. + Plymouth Rd.

AP1GczPcVB5mf1UTmK9YIWdZddq7x8H0i9osCmRoJjHk6e6OEcHOwp1HOTlvY89m5JQd0LRY7ieCqmQjT05lHKz7kXMT8NBB7nSogUnPWj3lDtVaTMlYZ-99DFJ5Iv020tnXJ8LSTAIjXHGKi0T2i5qqDKt5Yw=w1514-h882-s-no-gm


Video from the front porch of that house showing the police returning fire at the onset of hostilities.

It reminds me of a conversation I had with a lady from Nigeria.

She couldn't believe media presence at violent events here.

In Canada a reporter is standing in front of a violent event, guns going off as the reporter says "Behind me a swat team is engaging an armed shooter...."

In Nigeria the reporter is saying "Three miles behind me and a mile to the west a swat team is engaging an armed shooter..."
 
Back
Top Bottom