You will probably have to do a portion of this yourself.
Fuel consumption during normal riding mostly depends on the 10% and below throttle positions. At such light engine load, your supercharger shouldn't have much effect, and you're never going to burn up a valve or piston at light load like that.
Normally you have to sneak up on leaner settings, but if it is as abysmally rich as it appears, it's likely quite safe to subtract 10 from the entire 0, 2, 5, and 10% columns as a starting point and see what happens. Don't be surprised if you end up with some negative numbers - my own PowerCommander map for a similar bike (but not supercharged!) has some areas that are below -30% adjustment.
If it runs better with that first adjustment then go 5% at a time, again do this to the entire columns. Keep right on going until you start feeling flat spots or lean misfires, then you know you've gone too far in the RPM range in which you notice that feeling, so backtrack a couple percent at a time in that specific RPM and throttle position range. DO NOT use this method to at higher throttle settings. It's quite safe only at cruise and moderate acceleration.
Ideally what you want to do is install an air/fuel ratio gauge and an intake manifold pressure gauge (not quite the same as a boost gauge - you want to measure what's happening downstream of the throttle for this). Air/fuel ratio 15.0 - 15.5 is fine for lean cruise with manifold pressure showing at least a bit of vacuum. 13-ish with manifold pressure near normal ambient pressure (not under boost). Under boost, it has to be rich, but how much ... is hard to tell and I don't want to venture a guess. The usual procedure for a normally-aspirated engine is to optimize the air/fuel ratio at full throttle for best torque output, but with supercharging (and stock compression ratio!) that setting could be dangerous.