if that's the case then why even have different classes if the bikes performance doesn't matter?
Don't be dumb.
I thought you were done with this conversation.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
if that's the case then why even have different classes if the bikes performance doesn't matter?
I could say the same about you.Don't be dumb.
I thought you were done with this conversation.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It was the only option until Bakaboy revealed RACE holds a 300 series. Don't care about csbk now.
So if you face any type of performance deficit (either perceived or real) you won't race? How much do you weight? How will you feel when a 90lb rider on another Ninja 300 motors past you like you're tied to a tree?
What most people are trying to tell you is that the performance difference between the bikes is insignificant.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
When did I imply you were the villian? I just wish this info was available sooner. ie RACE promoted it.How'd I become the villian? Hell I'm the one that spent personal capital to force the hand to have the 300 class created.
I understand the desire to have a competitive bike in a competitive class.
My youngest was stuck with only 1 class per weekend on his CBR250. And even then he was up against 50 hp bikes in Production. Sportsman Lightweight was gone so my only choice for a 2nd class for him was to put him in Rookie Challenge against 600s.
I need 300 cc or equal bikes to come out and race. I'm the one that forced Chris' hand on the class.
If you sit on your hands the class will disappear. Especially when I stop supporting the low cc bike class shortly.
I could say the same about you.
Guess I'll start throwing up after every meal then.
WTF is the point of this argument anyway? Some of you guys are making it sound like what I'm asking is out of this world or unheard of. I want to race a 300cc bike in a 300cc grid, is that so unreal? Just like 600s want to race against 600s and litres against litres.
At this point, as per bakaboy, there is apparently an unadvertised 300 grid in RACE. My wish came true!!!! ...let's move on, yeesh.
read the rules. conveniently outlines in red as Kyle pointed out.So which specific 400cc street based two strokes would be a viable option for that class?
Share with us from your vast wealth of knowledge which bike would provide such an unfair advantage.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
read the rules. conveniently outlines in red as Kyle pointed out.
Ask Ken, he contributed to the rule book. He wouldn't have put it there if it didn't exist.Answer the question.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ask Ken, he contributed to the rule book. He wouldn't have put it there if it didn't exist.
Huh?
The point of this argument is that you're concerned over nothing. The performance difference between the bikes permitted in the classes you could realisitically run in are minimal. Despite what some with no real race experience are suggesting.
We've told you repeatedly. You still don't believe us?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Don't give 2 ***** which make or model. It's in the rule book.Don't deflect.
You're claiming that a 400cc street based two stoke would be significant performance advantage. Tell us which bikes (make and model) you are referring to.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Don't give 2 ***** which make or model. It's in the rule book.
apparentlyYou have no idea what you're talking about.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No I don't believe you, because you guys are posting contradicting information.
I'm being told skilled riders on 600s are beating new riders on 750s. That means skilled riders on 750s will easy beat 600s.
If the guys in RACE have worked to create a 300 grid obviously there's some concern with unfair advantages present with the allowed bikes in the Lightweight grid.