The Road Warrior
Well-known member
Exactly.
|
|
|
Safety first! Helmets should be compulsory for everyone. Accidents do not happen on the basis of religion.
- Thread starter deckard
- Start date
Exactly.
If you're ever bored, throw a full face helmet on and go for a drive. It is pretty damned hilarious. When people notice, they give you a lot of space as they figure you are about to do something reallynreally dumb.
Riceburner
Well-known member
But they have to be close enough in the first place.....
Try to walk into a courtroom with a knife on your belt and see how far you get.
It's also illegal AFAIK
Roadghost
Well-known member
Lulz. If you want to start a 10-page heated debate just start talking about helmet laws for motorcycles. A lot of bikers hate that law and anyone who supports it. Give someone special status because of religion and the whole thing goes in "diverse" directions.
Interesting. Source? I quickly tried to find something but came up alm9st empty? It wouldnt surprise me either way.
Roll Cages & Helmets?
I can't find anything in the books. Can only comment from personal shenanigans + cops.
the insurance companies care about motorcycles
enough to price it so that it has nearly wiped out supersport bikes off the streets
their intended goal since we were unable to control ourselves despite the 50 over stunting law that came into effect many years ago
yes, many re-entry and older riders as stated previously and their heavy cruisers hit the deck as well
so yes, motorcycling is dangerous and allowing riders to not wear a helmet seems like a step in the wrong direction
will the next elected provincial government toss this law aside for the greater good?
enough to price it so that it has nearly wiped out supersport bikes off the streets
their intended goal since we were unable to control ourselves despite the 50 over stunting law that came into effect many years ago
yes, many re-entry and older riders as stated previously and their heavy cruisers hit the deck as well
so yes, motorcycling is dangerous and allowing riders to not wear a helmet seems like a step in the wrong direction
will the next elected provincial government toss this law aside for the greater good?
Mad Mike
Well-known member
I hope so. Personally I would never, have never ridden my bikes in without proper shows/boots, pants, gloves and a helmet. That said, I prefer the freedom of choice -- nanny has enough to worry about, leave the personal safety choices to me.
Sure. That and the "temporary" GST.
Thats true but its not the point. The rest of us are forced to follow the helmet law that has been in place forever. We are forced to spent money on a helmet.
First its helmets, then its XYZ and then its mandatory prayer rooms and breaks during the work day for another group.
Riceburner
Well-known member
Many place have to have multi faith rooms and allow for prayer breaks already.
I didnt know it was law. Soon it will be banks must provide a person with a specific religious background interest free loans and mortgages because interest is forbidden in their religion. I know a couple who can never buy a house for this reason.
Mad Mike
Well-known member
I think a lot of companies and or office buildings provide non-denominational prayer rooms/spaces as part of their diversity and inclusivity efforts -- it's just good business. Staff use these on their own time, either lunch or breaks.
ricplayer
Well-known member
Since becoming funded by the government, you do not need to be catholic to attend a catholic school.
Completely agree with your golden rule. The fact remains this law is unfair and exclusionary.
|
|
|
|
|