I guess if 'Ducati' can only mean a big vibey L-twin with a noisy clutch, expensive and short service intervals via desmo valves, ropey build quality, etc., then this is probably true. Sure, some character is lost, I get that, but the end result is a much nicer motorcycle for day-to-day use that can actually live up to its name.
Maybe it's because I've never cared much about the stuff that some associate with Ducati (single sided swingarm, desmo valves, rattly clutch, steel frame, etc.), but I'm not that fussed about them moving forward. They've gone from a niche brand with mostly race-bred sportbikes to a much broader manufacturer. If I had a complaint, it would be them mostly giving up on superbikes for GP racing, which has resulted in less interesting street sportbikes. Until recently, the same could be said about Honda, I guess.
Add it to the Euro 5 casualty list, which also includes an entire class in 600 supersports.
If the sales were there, they'd find a way. Euro 5 hasn't killed the S1000RR, the Tuono, the H2, the Goldwing, etc. It's killed old bikes that aren't selling. In the old days, some of those bikes may have hung around because the tooling was done (old Concours, anyone?), but not anymore.
My bigger beef is with the EPA, who insist on doing their own regulations. This forces manufacturers to build Euro 5 bikes for the rest of the world (China, India and Japan all use a version of the Euro regs as their model), then gimp it to also fit in the US (and by extension, Canada). This results in bikes with broken fuelling as standard (S1000RR and ZX-10R being prominent examples) needing a flashed ECU fresh off the showroom floor...