No, I didn't miss that, but they came to Canada with the intention of a better life, as was described in the quote in my post. Where they ended up has nothing to do with their intention when they came.
Didn't want to say it with all the work you're doing. Yes, it was hideous. Although I'm scared to click "submit" as I recall once giving my opinion of a friend's girlfriend after they broke up (he asked, she was a bimbo)... then they got back together.
You shouldn't feel the need; I, nor anyone else, asked for your opinion. You rang in on your own.
So moving here for a job would be to maintain or better your career, not worsen it, as was my point. Anything that occurred after moving here is a decision made on circumstance.
I think you've...
And yet here you are starting a keyboard argument with me for some reason.
No, but I did ask for an example.
My original comment asked for me to be shown an example of someone who came to Canada for a worse life. I'd still like to see that example.
Why's that? Do you know me well enough...
Short answer to all your questions was already answered by Rob; innocent until proven guilty. Until a conviction is registered any actions taken against him would be unlawful.
Something to keep in mind re; the SIU and their charge rate is that they are mandated to investigate ANY incident...
Simplified, it's called R.I.C.E and the four P's;
The acronym "R.I.C.E." represents:
R =Repetition (of the offence)
I =Identity (of the accused)
C =Court (likelihood of appearing for)
E =Evidence (protection of).
The four P's are;
Protection of the public interest
Protection of the accused...
Agreed re; HD Town Line. Further, last winter was hell on River Rd out there. As of last month when I last went down there, there are bike eating potholes everywhere... I brought a newer rider there, in that I like the route, and instantly regretted it.
I NEVER said the rider was 100% innocent, but the rider is dead so not able to be charged. I still say that the car driver's decision was negligent and created this situation and that the appropriate charge is before the courts.
I'm feeling the same way.
M4 and RA (which the OP meant to be AR) are the same platform.
HK5 (MP5) is an SMG, not an assault rifle
F90 (FN P90) is not an assault rifle
FN FAL is a battle rifle, not an assault rifle
HK 91 is a battle rifle, not an assault rifle
Ruger 10/22 was a funny post
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.