It doesn't need to have all of those characteristics to make the list. Those are just a shopping list for bureaucrats to point at when making arbitrary decisions. I haven't bothered to look at the full list of high-risk bikes. I assume, they are targeting RR bikes so low cc or most naked bikes don't get included.
From the list, it looks like all of the criteria have to be met, if one of these conditions aren't met then it's OK. (Does anyone see any bike on their prohibited list that does not meet all of these criteria? There are some that don't have a passenger seat at all.) It's unclear what's meant by an "oversize" frame.
The smaller bikes won't meet the 0.5 hp/kg criteria. An R7 would be borderline. R3 nowhere close.
R3, Ninja 400/500, etc only have single front disk brake, in addition to being nowhere close to the power-to-weight criteria.
What a silly world we live in where two disk brakes = more unsafe than one...
Like a F700GS is any less safe than the F650GS before it... They use the same motor, they're 90% the same motorcycle. But BMW gave the 700GS an extra front disk for added safety danger!
From the list, it looks like all of the criteria have to be met, if one of these conditions aren't met then it's OK. (Does anyone see any bike on their prohibited list that does not meet all of these criteria? There are some that don't have a passenger seat at all.) It's unclear what's meant by an "oversize" frame.
The smaller bikes won't meet the 0.5 hp/kg criteria. An R7 would be borderline. R3 nowhere close.
R3, Ninja 400/500, etc only have single front disk brake, in addition to being nowhere close to the power-to-weight criteria.
SAAQ also notes that a motorcycle does not need to have all of the above visual and technical characteristics to be deemed part of the high-risk motorcycle category.
I think that was the issue with it that I had that I forgot yesterday.... When the system becomes a joke, it erodes people taking the system seriously, and encourages people to just ignore it since they see it as a sham anyway.
If they kept a real tight list, that every motorcyclist was like "yeaahhhh bud, they're right, maybe give it a couple years before you get that bike" that would be one thing... but when you have ancient shitboxes that could barely keep up with the average midsize 2026 street bike classified as "high risk" it's like lol, you're a joke... and when things are a joke, are people more inclined to take them seriously, or to laugh at them?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.