Any issues like this with the FJ09?
It's the same engine, but one would hope that with the later start of production, they should only be getting updated parts installed on the production line.
Any issues like this with the FJ09?
So the FZ09's price was too good to be true .... Too bad, sounded great on paper.
Hopefully, this will be all the bad stuff you will have to go through.
Please also note that, because of the large number of complaints we receive annually, complainants are not usually contacted unless additional information is required.
I had a problem with a new bike I bought in 1984. Seems things have not changed at Yamaha decades later. The Yamaha I bought was a problematic piece of junk. Their customer service was flippant, and unhelpful. I know there will be a few who protest to the contrary, but do yourself a favor and don't buy a Yamaha. I was warned before I bought my bike decades ago and I didn't listen. I regretted it later. Get a Honda if you must have a sport bike.
[/FONT]
Gotta love Suzuki. I got my master cylinder replaced on a 10 yr old bike plus new throttle cables. All at zero cost!
Thanks Suzuki!
I actually disagree. What would happen if the Cam Chain jumps a tooth due to been too lose and you are riding on the 401?Safety items as part of a recall or to avoid one, not necessarily goodwill from Suzuki . A CCT is not a safety item.
Gotta love Suzuki. I got my master cylinder replaced on a 10 yr old bike plus new throttle cables. All at zero cost!
Thanks Suzuki!
Gotta love Suzuki. I got my master cylinder replaced on a 10 yr old bike plus new throttle cables. All at zero cost!
Thanks Suzuki!
Suzuki, that thing has never given me a single problem. The R1 endurance bike in the other hand, not so great.I agree. Even the r/r recall. My dealer ordered the part called when it was in and replaced it while I waited. What make is you're oh so great race bike paulo?. J/k.
My old master cylinder functioned for 10 yrs without a "major" differenceSafety items as part of a recall or to avoid one, not necessarily goodwill from Suzuki . A CCT is not a safety item.
You won't like my answer but I agree that the issue started with the dealer. I've worked for one of the major auto manufacturers and have dealt with many dealers (car and motorcycle). A technical bulletin is NOT a recall, it is a step by step process to diagnose and fix the problem. Usually (depending on the nature of the tech bulletin) the first step is to try and correct the issue without replacing the part. I've had this happen a few times, sometimes the first step fixes the problem and sometimes it doesn't. If the first step doesn't correct the issue then the next step is usually a replacement of the part.
Had your dealer understood the tech bulletin they probably would have known that an attempt to fix the issue without replacing the part was probably the first step.
At the end of the day, you dealt with a bit of extra back and forth but they did come through and replace the part.
I've had a clutch installed improperly - twice, from Suzuki.
Almost went Kawasaki, except they were uglier, and everyone was raving about how bulletproof my bike was.
The only Yamaha that I've ridden was an ergonomic challenge.
If Honda had had anything similar. . .
You won't like my answer but I agree that the issue started with the dealer. I've worked for one of the major auto manufacturers and have dealt with many dealers (car and motorcycle). A technical bulletin is NOT a recall, it is a step by step process to diagnose and fix the problem. Usually (depending on the nature of the tech bulletin) the first step is to try and correct the issue without replacing the part. I've had this happen a few times, sometimes the first step fixes the problem and sometimes it doesn't. If the first step doesn't correct the issue then the next step is usually a replacement of the part.
Had your dealer understood the tech bulletin they probably would have known that an attempt to fix the issue without replacing the part was probably the first step.
At the end of the day, you dealt with a bit of extra back and forth but they did come through and replace the part.
Fair comment. The thing is that once you see the part and realize that the screw is to short from stopping the Chain Tensioner set screw to back out, you will then realize that an adjustment is just a temporary remedy and that it will malfunction again like it did for me after 1 day. It isn't that some of the parts have a characteristic that may or may not fail, it is a design flaw, hence why they had to redesign the part and give it a new part number to replace the old one.
You sent you're bike to japan twice?? If not suzuki did not replace you're clutch. A mechanic that figured he didn't have to read the service manual did. Who knows he may work for honda now.
As any other new model, there will always be issues with it, so far IMO the issues are not that bad, it is how Yamaha chose to deal with them is what i have a problem with. Excellent bike and I wouldn't want any other one.
I would normally agree, but this bike has had it's share of issues, stepping out of the norm, whether a faulty part designed correctly or plain wrong design from the get go ... suspension and fuel mapping. They either should have charged more or simply work on it longer, rather than release half *** product.
Most people would sort of shake their head and move on if it was KTM bike, but Yamaha?? No way ...