Because it's great fun when they work! The traction control is useful with 193 HP on a 450 lb bike.
It's about safety. HP increases in SS bikes in the early 2000s just lead to a LOT of deaths, accidents and banned lists.
Because it's great fun when they work! The traction control is useful with 193 HP on a 450 lb bike.
A car has 4 wheels and a cage around.
A car's components are more sealed vs. a bike.
A bike's braking system is a very simple and effective system WITHOUT electronics.
It just takes that 1 time for the electronics to screw up and you are hurt or dead.
btw- drivers have gotten worse because they rely on those devices to drive the car therefore they go faster in bad weather etc...
Hell you don't even have to look at the road because while you are texting the car will stop itself if you get too close to another car in front of you.
The issue with BMW bikes is the same with their cars: poor design reliability from Bosch.
Ahhh cant wait!
Everyone does 20km/h 2 feet behind each other yet this is how it always ends up lol
![]()
Again, wrong, a F150 pickup stops faster than most sport bikes. No one can stop faster and safer than an ABS bike.
Even in dry. Lots of data that proves this.
I would say this is wrong.
An F-150 would be around 140 feet.
http://on.aol.com/video/2010-light-duty-shootout--60-0-braking-501692117
My bike (01 F4i, not even the newest technology) says 111.3' 60-0mph, show me an F-150 that stops shorter than that?
http://www.mcnews.com/mcn/articles/2010JanIndex.pdf
There is nothing you can do, more electronics for bikes much like cars. There will be less fatalities for bike riders just like car drivers.
The most important device which will be overlooked is the RIDER.
Back on track, you can get 2012 for $13000
http://www.s1000rrforum.com/forum/b.../38489-2012-fire-blue-sale-fort-worth-tx.html
Sure, if you drive down to Texas and bring it back and then put a conversion kit on it.
2011, I would say $13-14k is the appropriate price range. Expect $14-15 on a 2012 with that many km's.