Not easy riders: Aging bikers 3 times more likely to get injured

suzuki2000

Well-known member
interesting article

http://todayhealth.today.com/_news/...ikers-3-times-more-likely-to-get-injured?lite


Jim Lattimore, of Franklin, Tenn., has ridden over 800,000 miles on motorcycles in 74 countries over a span of nearly five decades. He still owns 14 bikes. But he’s 69, now.
“My reactions, admittedly, and I hate to say this, are not what they used to be,” he told NBCNews.com.
Reaction times, dexterity and physical conditioning all decline with age. But about 15 years ago, motorcycling, which requires all these, became increasingly popular among people over 50 who were rediscovering their inner Wild One, cite the authors of a study being released today by Brown University epidemiologists in the journal Injury Prevention.
Using data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System, which monitors a representative sample of hospital emergency departments, the researchers found roughly 1.4 million injuries to motorcyclists over age 20 between 2001 and 2008. Eighty-five percent of cases were male.
Most injuries occurred in younger people, but the number of cases among people over 50 increased by 247 percent, from 4,352 to 15,107. While the number of injuries increased in all age groups, the over-50 riders were on a steeper curve by far.
Just as importantly, older riders tended to be injured more severely. They had the highest rate of hospitalization. Over one-third, 35 percent, required a stay. They also had the highest rate of fractures and internal organ (including head and neck) damage.
“If you’re looking at the segment of motorcyclists who are injured and the types of injuries sustained among those who visit emergency departments,” lead author Tracy Jackson, a Phd student, explained, “older adults are a greater percentage of the severe injuries.”
For the purpose of the study, Jackson said, she defined “severe” as fractures and dislocations, or any kind of internal organ injury. Contusions, lacerations, and abrasions were classified as non-severe.
The data the team used did not include fatalities. But in the study, Jackson cites National Highway Traffic Safety Administration numbers to point out that in 2001, 4.46 percent of fatal motorcycle injuries “were sustained by individuals 60 years and older.” By 2008, it was 10 percent. Fatalities among those aged 40-59 increased from 37.14 percent to 43.26 percent of all motorcyclist deaths.
From a public health standpoint, Jackson said, “it’s interesting to note that the number of injuries in older riders is increasing every five years, it seems like. More people are engaging in motorcycle riding and because of this, you want to make sure that population is properly trained and wearing proper gear.”
That’s exactly what Lattimore and his wife, Joey, who also rides, stress to anybody who asks them about taking up motorcycling for the first time or after a long layoff.
“I tell them the first thing to do is go take a riding course, a formal course, not one taught by your brother-in-law,” he said with a laugh. “I am adamant about that. Both Joey and I, even with all the riding we’ve done, we take some kind of refresher course every year.” Just like pilots have to undergo regular training, no matter how long they’ve been flying, Lattimore thinks motorcyclists should do the same. “It’s too easy to fall into bad habits,” he said.
That’s what the motorcycle industry, painfully aware of its reputation for danger, encourages. The major manufacturers established the Motorcycle Safety Foundation which develops rider courses and training materials. Its mission statement, according to the group’s website, is to “make motorcycling safer and more enjoyable by ensuring access to lifelong quality education and training for current and prospective riders, and by advocating a safer riding environment.”
But Lattimore has also trimmed down his bike collection from 24. His old “crotch rockets" -- like a very fast Suzuki Hyabusa -- are gone. “I used to ride really, really, stupidly fast,” he said. Most of his riding time is now spent on a BMW R1200, a cruiser. And, partly to accommodate his slower reaction times, he rides slower. He doesn’t always wear the full complement of protective gear, like hip, knee, and spine pads, but he never rides without a helmet even where state law permits.
“A helmet is a must, all the time,” he said. “Head-on-pavement gets you killed.”
Despite the accommodations to age, Lattimore, who’s retired from the accounting firm he founded, has no intention of giving up riding. After all, he said, in all those miles during all those years, he’s only had one real accident, in the Chilean Andes. Another motorcyclist crashed into him.
Brian Alexander ([url]www.BrianRAlexander.com[/URL]) is co-author, with Larry Young Ph.D., of "The Chemistry Between Us: Love, Sex and the Science of Attraction," ([url]www.TheChemistryBetweenUs.com[/URL]), now on sale.
 
Need controls on how many were "new riders" versus long time continuous riders.
Without that - not a lot of use.

Not quite sure where the "reaction times" come into play either as the teens have the fastest reaction times and the highest problems.

There are a lot good deals out there ( including my own ride ) from people that get in over their head as later in life newbies.

Needs some work to be useful

I can understand the injury aspect IF there is a crash....but something seems odd as none of that premise shows up in the insurance rates. ...just sayin'
 
no arguement that there are many variables that affect the statistics they report, but on purely face value the article has some interesting info.

All riders at all ages have such a wide variety of skill, further to that there is a huge range of risk tolerance. I would argue that as people age, get homes, kids, other responsibilities risk tolerance lessens. I have no scientific proof, this is just my opinion...;)

When older riders choose to start riding at later ages, i would also argue that perhaps they are doing so more for the recreational value, not riding as a needed/primary means of transportation. These older riders also likely have the ability to afford bigger bikes out of the gate rather then starting on 125's and 250's to keep affordable insurance.

Does this mean an older rider is more likely to get injured? perhaps. I am certain of this, if I were to go doen on my bike today I am positive I would not "bounce" near as well as I would have 20 years ago
 
There are lies, damn lies and then statistics. Article is really meaningless. Any older person will suffer greater injuries in an accident than a younger person. This includes falling off a ladder, slipping in the tub or on the sidewalk. About 25% of hospitalizations for people over 65 are fall related.

The rate of accidents could be an issue. New motorcyclists are more likely to be in an accident in the first couple of years and if combined with slower reaction times then this be a factor, then again, older riders are likely less risk takers than younger ones so there is an offset here as well. Many older riders ride less frequently than younger ones and skills get rusty if you're out there once or twice a month vs being a daily rider. I could also ague that while reaction time might be slower, 30 - 40 years of driving or riding experience might mean that once an older rider reacts he then does the right thing, like braking and riding around a left turning car vs braking and target fixating right into the fender. Who knows, too many variables.
 
No disrespect to any of the trackday organizers,but the reason i only do DOCC days is because it is a more "mature" group of riders.
 
I ride with a buddy that is 70 and his ride is an R1.

He's riden since a teenager but every year he seems to get worse for reaction time. I worry he may take me out one day.
 
No disrespect to any of the trackday organizers,but the reason i only do DOCC days is because it is a more "mature" group of riders.

Mature is good word to use there; it does not come with age, but experience. The implication that experience comes with age is not entirely untrue, however a lifetime of bad habits creates a very poor experience to lean on (see what I did there? :P).

As MacDoc noted, the ratio of new to experienced riders is very important to know with these statistics. If anything, all this has told me is that you become more fragile with age. Not news.
 
Does this mean an older rider is more likely to get injured? perhaps. I am certain of this, if I were to go doen on my bike today I am positive I would not "bounce" near as well as I would have 20 years ago

Actually you might be surprised at that. I've fallen a few times in the dirt over the last couple of years ( slow speed but still some impact on the armored jacket ) and hopped right back on.

What does change is how long the aches and pains stay after the bounce :D

I do think a 71 year old on an R1 might be pushing the category a bit .....but then R1 riders are generally pushing the envelope ....likely does not change with time. ;)
 
[QUOTE

I do think a 71 year old on an R1 might be pushing the category a bit .....but then R1 riders are generally pushing the envelope ....likely does not change with time. ;)[/QUOTE]

The R1 is a motorcycle just like any other. It can be made as comfortable to ride with modifications as a modern lesser sporting bike. It is the rider, age is not a factor, who decides in what manner he wishes to ride it. I think that I am more likely to have an accident on my 1982 CB900f with its poor brakes, skinny tires, and so so handling, than my GSXR1000.

To me it is quite obvious why older riders are having increased accidents. A large percentage of them never properly learnt how to ride a motorcycle. They went into a dealership and bought the first big touring boat that was on offer. Blinged it out but didn't bother to buy correct riding gear, because that would hurt their image on the boat they were riding. Then they wobbled around "learning" how to handle their 800 lb. boat.

The government should legislate that new riders start on smaller c.c. machines and then graduate to larger bikes, thereby obtaining some rider skills.
 
Yeah in Australia the have Learner bikes that are not based on CC alone but on horsepower and seating.
The KLR650 I ride here is Learner approved and I converted it to single seat so my liability insurance that you buy annually with your "rego" ( registration ) is $270 or so.

Friend I ride with is a wildman on the dirt and in his 50s - he rides a very powerful 650 off road but is not allowed to ride more than 650 cc on the road.

More sensible, lower insurance rates.

Europe also has graduated systems and that would at least keep the well off in money and poor in experience to more suitable rides.
The 500s coming out are often designed around these graduated licences and I think that's a good thing - both the choice and brake on inexperienced riders buying big bikes.

I've always preferred intermediates and I'm still iffy on the ST1100 I just snagged. Can't imagine this as a first bike for anyone no matter what age.
 
Back
Top Bottom