brucewayne
Well-known member
i like turtles
Last edited:
Steaming crock of ****???
Maybe you should attend a few funerals of novice motorcycle riders... See the anguish in the eyes of the parents of the deceased child.... Not a pretty sight my friend.
I wonder w
hat those parents would say about more stringent rules for qualifying for a licence to ride a motorcycle??? You step up to them and tell them that it is a 'Steaming crock of ****'. G'head, I dare ya.... :thumbleft:[/QUOTE
Love the red herring argument, nice one. What you gleefully ignored, and as Macdoc again pointed out as well, is that we are talking about a REALISTIC entry into riding, in this case being a smaller bike which would definitely fall under your hypothetical scenario of more stringent qualifying to ride. Oh, and thanks for making assumptions of what funerals I've attended, or particularly accident scenes of young riders. I'd never argue on behalf of a 16 yr old on a super sport, but I believe I already made that clear.
The critical point of this discussion is the ability to acclimate to the intricacies of a motorcycle. By design, they are a visceral experience, and being able to learn such a machine at an early age in realistic increments is ideal for a long and healthy enjoyment of the sport. Given what history has taught us about people in general, it makes absolutely no sense to wait until much later to get into it. I've seen plenty of well-seasoned car drivers that bought their first bike at 40 that had a brutal learning curve in large part due to their ego that comes with years of driving experience. Are you one of these types that ***** on people for taking their children as passengers too? If this fear mongering is so justified for you, I might suggest that you take up a cause preventing kids from skiing, football, hockey, boxing, etc etc too. Yes, funerals suck. Being dead while you are alive sucks more.
What counts in riding is experience off pavement and on and the longer the better....cars don't count.
I'd suggest those parents would say the rider was doing what they loved.
When a mistake happens on behalf of the driver (or someone else), which face it, is very likely during the initial baby-steps learning stages of driving....survivability is far better in a cage.
Anyone who suggests that a newly minted 16 year old driver is going to go out and know everything (despite what they think), be able to anticipate everything, and handles his vehicle perfectly is living in some la-la land of alternate reality. They're not invincible either, again, despite what they think.
A very, very small percentage of those left behind look at it from that perspective. When someone very intentionally and by choice, despite the odds, puts themselves in a dangerous situation and pays the ultimate price, most people left behind often wish that their loved one had made a better choice, not that he "died doing what he loved".
I agree the OP is making a wise choice starting out on a low CC bike, seems responsible and realistic, etc etc etc...but when it comes down to it and he's out driving one day and gets into a situation where more experience would have been able to prevent it, it's hard to not argue the old saying - experience counts. Gaining that initial baby-steps experience is far safer in a cage.
it's hard to not argue the old saying - experience counts. Gaining that initial baby-steps experience is far safer in a cage.
Private aircraft have a fatality rate about 19 times greater than driving. It is also true that a majority of the accidents that occur are pilot error (71%) and could have been prevented.
Driving experience is driving experience is driving experience, period.It's not hard at all.....driving a cage is not riding a motorcycle and from my perspective is a negative. I have two very good riders my son and his friend ( now my staff ) who I've participated with since they started off road nearly a decade ago to illustrate my point.
My son got his G for work when he was 22. No tickets, no accidents, and he rides hard. Rides 9 months of the year and did a 10k 22 day trip to the west with me this summer.
Both started off road at Motopark, both started with small bikes..my son with two 50cc scoots and then moved up.
The OP is on the right track...leave off with the negative crap...gets tiresome. The way you learn to be responsble is to take responsibility.
He's come here to ask questions and get intelligent answer, not get talked out it by pantywaists
I gotta say PrivatePilot...if that's indicative of your "other pursuit"....you are hardly one to lecture...
If he's going to live out in the sticks, never go into the city, and move to Australia for six months of the year, then it might be less consequential to not have city driving experience
Motorcyclists '23% better' behind the wheel of a car
Finally, a leading insurer’s data shows what we’ve all know for years – we are safer behind the wheel than non-motorcyclists
Read more: http://www.visordown.com/motorcycle...d-the-wheel-of-a-car/23971.html#ixzz3urg9FT7X
Makes good sense... ^^^^^^^^
x2.
When a kid starts driving you have no clue what you're driving headlong into, with no clue nor understanding of the sheer stupidity of most other drivers on the road..and you're at the whim of forces you have no idea even exist yet (physics to mention but one)...due to inexperience. That's a lot of things going against a new driver.
Put a brand new driver behind the wheel of a car and set off into traffic and see how quickly they get mentally overwhelmed and "behind" in their actions - it happens to most very quickly. Would you really want your kid mentally overloaded, 2 or 3 seconds behind in physical control vs mental observation, and all alone with nobody to give them advice or pointers...on a bike?
Having a cage (literally) around you during that formative stage is a potential lifesaver, quite literally.