...hmmm. Don't think so.
Grififin said "If you think they don't bother people.....you have another think coming." It means "think again".
you're right.... it all depends if you're new school or old school...............
ride safe!
...hmmm. Don't think so.
Grififin said "If you think they don't bother people.....you have another think coming." It means "think again".
The fatality mentioned in the article is our late member DSJ.
Here's what bothers me about legislating loud pipes ... my bike came stock with fantastic sounding pipes. I rode with a guy this weekend who owns a Buell Lightning ... factory exhaust on that thing was really loud. Both bikes sound beautiful, in my opinion. However, it'll be the opinion of the cops that matter ... and I see a ride like the one I had this weekend being interrupted (possibly more than once) by cops assuming the pipes are too loud.
I would really prefer not to have to go through decibel checks every time I take my bike out and pass an unfamiliar LEO. Moreover, I like my bike too much to trade it in for a burgman.
d
wtf happened?
I haven't heard any differently than reported in the news. Riding quickly, crashed into a pole (although given the propensity to exaggerate, quickly may have been 51 km/h).
http://www.gtamotorcycle.com/vbforum/showthread.php?176546-2013_09_07-rose-dale-valley-road-rip
I don't think it is strange at all. I have seen too many drunk or aggressive drivers weaving their car all over both road lanes and highways on Friday and Saturday evenings. They don't need to make physical contact to cause a problem. A sideswipe or sudden merge in my opinion would be plausible enough to cause someone to stumble and lose control as they fight to regain control especially if there was a pothole in a curve.
Huh? I was addressing a flaw in the logic of the article - adding a decibel limit does not improve upon the enforceability of current legislation, in the scenario that the author puts forth which is that the need of an enforcement officer on-hand is a weakness.
The point of articles like this, even in right-wings rags like the National Compost, is that society is getting fed up with these attention whores with their straight pipes and track exhaust.
They give motorcyclists a bad image, they make us all seem like self-involved a-holes.
This is all political fuel to ban motorcycles.
Frankly, Im looking hard at an electric bike in the near future. I test drove one in California and was really impressed.
think=thing
just sayinnnnnnnn
...hmmm. Don't think so.
Grififin said "If you think they don't bother people.....you have another think coming." It means "think again".
you're right.... it all depends if you're new school or old school...............
ride safe!
Loud is bullsht... idiots on sportbikes with shorty cans, idiots on Harleys with open pipes.. they should all be ticketed into oblivion. Talk about selfish entitlement. I'm sure we've all been out walking around (especially downtown) when a moron on a Harley rides by and all conversations have to stop until he's gone. Makes me want to run out on the street and smash their faces in.
If only people who wrote articles about motorcycle related topics actually knew ANYTHING about motorcycles it would be so refreshing.
There is one issue with SAE J2825-based legislation, and that is the non-trivial cost of implementing it. Every cop that you want to be able to enforce it will need a testing device, and training on how to use it. It's preferable for riders/drivers, but not for police departments.
I don't think it is strange at all. I have seen too many drunk or aggressive drivers weaving their car all over both road lanes and highways on Friday and Saturday evenings. They don't need to make physical contact to cause a problem. A sideswipe or sudden merge in my opinion would be plausible enough to cause someone to stumble and lose control as they fight to regain control especially if there was a pothole in a curve.
I get so angry when I hear this constant "we need more laws" BS. We don't need more laws, we need to enforce the ones we have. Case in point: cell phone laws. WTF ??? Don't give me a ticket for what I MIGHT do, give me a ticket for what I HAVE done. We already had a law for that, it was and still is called distracted driving. Every single study ever done on the subject has found that having a phone conversation with a handsfree is just as dangerous as holding a phone. So I get a ticket for holding my phone because by doing so, I'm a horribly dangerous driver just waiting to kill someone; but buy a new vehicle and you can have a handsfree phone conversation that I just started by dialing the number with the physical keypad on the dash, all the while screwing around with the built in GPS and screwing with the menu on that seperate screen in the gauge cluster and I'm the model of a responsible driver.
There is one issue with SAE J2825-based legislation, and that is the non-trivial cost of implementing it. Every cop that you want to be able to enforce it will need a testing device, and training on how to use it. It's preferable for riders/drivers, but not for police departments.