Just wondering if anyone has had any denied warranty issues related to a vehicle's regular maintenance schedule vs. the "severe" schedule.
My 2020 Kia Telluride with just 60,000 km is dealer serviced at this time. It's been made crystal clear that Kia considers 99% of Canada to meet severe service requirement due to cold temps + snow + salt etc....... So far I've fended off a number of "recommended" services that fit the severe service schedule interval or sometimes at less mileage than that.
Today's example is to check the differential fluid every 60k km, but to change it every 120k km if severe service. So I get told today by the dealer it needs to be changed at 60k km for $300............ which I declined.
Kia has a regular schedule, a severe schedule and dealers have their own service interval recommendations which more often than not exceed the frequency of Kia's severe schedule.
There was a class action lawsuit in Quebec about Kia's service schedule and that it mislead Canadians re service costs. the suit maintained that if 99% of Canada is severe service for all intents that is the "regular" service schedule and the other one should be removed from the owner's manual. Apparently Kia stipulated that no one has been denied warranty coverage because they adhered to the Kia schedule (presumably the "severe" schedule) vs. service intervals recommended by the dealer. The class action was dismissed.
courdappelduquebec.ca
My 2020 Kia Telluride with just 60,000 km is dealer serviced at this time. It's been made crystal clear that Kia considers 99% of Canada to meet severe service requirement due to cold temps + snow + salt etc....... So far I've fended off a number of "recommended" services that fit the severe service schedule interval or sometimes at less mileage than that.
Today's example is to check the differential fluid every 60k km, but to change it every 120k km if severe service. So I get told today by the dealer it needs to be changed at 60k km for $300............ which I declined.
Kia has a regular schedule, a severe schedule and dealers have their own service interval recommendations which more often than not exceed the frequency of Kia's severe schedule.
There was a class action lawsuit in Quebec about Kia's service schedule and that it mislead Canadians re service costs. the suit maintained that if 99% of Canada is severe service for all intents that is the "regular" service schedule and the other one should be removed from the owner's manual. Apparently Kia stipulated that no one has been denied warranty coverage because they adhered to the Kia schedule (presumably the "severe" schedule) vs. service intervals recommended by the dealer. The class action was dismissed.
Martel c. Kia Canada inc.
Consumer protection – prohibited business practices – conformity of the good – automobile – frequency of maintenance – class action