Search results

If you don't find someone who is supposed to be playing mid to late teens annoying, they aren't doing it right.

If it's Pythonesque that you want, then what you're looking for is "Maid Marian and her Merry Men."

It's being discussed on a forum that I'm a member of, that is base din the UK. Pretty good comments from the English contingent. I haven't seen it.

"Nobody 2" - More family man John Wick. If you liked the first, then you'll like the second.

The latest. I can see a lot of room for improvement but I could only get there by trying.

After watching Toxie, I think I need some more Peter Dinklage. Time for a rewatch of "Knights of Badassdom" which will, no doubt, remind me once again that friends have told me the original creator's vision was far better, before it was nerfed by producers. (I just had a look at the credis and...

The new "Toxic Avanger" reboot, starring Peter Dinklage: If you're a fan of the original then this is pretty true to it, with higher production values. Still the same bloody practical effects that you've come to expect from Troma. Elijah Wood and Kevin Bacon?!

You do realize that I said maximum, not minimum.

Sometimes I think there's a maximum IQ required to drive a dump truck.

Despite it being unlawful, some people will run without a front plate because it looks "cleaner." Sometimes the plate is in the front window. Sometimes it's not there at all.

I'm in Brampton. I would absolutely rat him out or, as I refer to it, facilitate the consequences of his actions.

His actions, after the collision, will certainly figure into his sentence and an act like this should rule out any deals, unless there is otherwise no real chance of obtaining a conviction for his actual actions.

Leaving the scene of an accident causing death is already a possible life sentence, under CC 320:16.

That would be an unconstitutional charge and would not stand muster. Pass a law like that and it's overturned in the first case.

If it's incompetence, they need "retraining" and a mark on their records. If it's corruption, they need charges.

I'm imagining that it's something like they failed to "caution" him, ie. what the Americans would call "reading him his rights." Seems superfluous to do it for a cop, but letter of the law and all that.

Fixed.

I'm wondering why it's considered an unlawful search and why The Crown just folded on it. A little more information would be nice.

It depends on the circumstances. If it was an unforeseen procedural issue then nothing should happen. That sort of thing comes up all the time. If they screwed up then a notation should be made in their files, that will affect future promotions and raises. If they "spiked the ball" for a buddy...

There's also the possibility that "paid by the load" was in play, which makes drivers take shortcuts on safety.