Search results

Oh sure, my context was leaning towards the fact that I doubt very much her interests (unions) align with the crown Corp. Employees.

No I mean she's an actual employee of the union, not the crown corporation.

She* last i checked. She works for the union, not Canada Post anyways.

Canada Post: Union president urges workers to reject deal Union president asks Canada Post workers to reject tentative agreement Lol.

Chance of layoff too high imo. Would only do it if I turned a wrench.

Cops treat bikes without pedals as a motorcycle. So that's potential failure to provide license, insurance, registration, plate, etc, etc.

LOL. Maybe I could see the shred of logic if the teenager was at fault. But the teenager got rear ended, in every version of our reality in this situation the person behind is at fault.

done

Ill update this with plans soon.

They are urban roadsters.

I don't think so at all. They would certainly be guilty of grand theft auto and a slew of driving infractions but not being able to legally drive a vehicle does not make you guilty of the above situation. The driver in the rear has 100% responsibility to not hit other vehicles ahead of them...

Not legal for the road doesn't mean they are at fault of the accident in this situation. Cop could charge careless, but unlikely. Im sure this situation happens every hour in this city. Doesnt seem serious enough to warrant one.

Walk me through how they are at fault for the accident, for being hit from behind. And what would the driver of the car (behind) be charged with?

Two things can be true at the same time.

LOL

Paging @Mad Mike didn't he sit down with some insurance execs and they couldn't or wouldn't go into this breakdown.

I rented an Airbnb about 35 mins away. Was 1/3 the price for anything near the track. I can probably find the details if you're interested

His family is wealthy...

Alright alright back to riding. Everyone's a critic.

I'll remember this betrayal. 😁