LOL.
Maybe I could see the shred of logic if the teenager was at fault. But the teenager got rear ended, in every version of our reality in this situation the person behind is at fault.
I don't think so at all.
They would certainly be guilty of grand theft auto and a slew of driving infractions but not being able to legally drive a vehicle does not make you guilty of the above situation. The driver in the rear has 100% responsibility to not hit other vehicles ahead of them...
Not legal for the road doesn't mean they are at fault of the accident in this situation.
Cop could charge careless, but unlikely. Im sure this situation happens every hour in this city. Doesnt seem serious enough to warrant one.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.