Search results

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTWoN-gnLA8 At the end of it all, the only metal you need, will have gun powder behind it :D

I would say that is not a valid point, if a person is wearing a helmet, the public is more likely stuck with the rehab bill due to serious injury without death. If they are not wearing a helmet, they are likely dead and no burden to us.

Ok, if I went in and said that I had a vision and in that vision my "god" told me it was forbidden to cover my head at all, no hats, no helmets, no nadda, I would be laughed out of the court room, no matter how genuine I believed in this tennant. (probably ordered for a psych exam as well) So...

:lmao: I'll give you that for sure. (it does add to the interest)

I don't have too many real problems, so I rely on this drivel nonsense to occupy my internet time. You do seem to have a serious hangup with me don't you... always waiting to jump right in with your smartie pants comments. Sometimes you must wonder if you are being baited no... anyway, carry on...

This ^ lol...

So I have to give up my beliefs to be allowed the same consideration... got it. Pathetic. Like I said, I agree they should be able to fight and win... but the win should be for all or none. "Your whoever, this law infringes... and in my case it infringes like this.... it should be struck down...

No I am not. But if they are making the case under freedom of religion, why cannot I make my case under some other guise? Say freedom of expression, (or say that the flying spaghetti monster hates helmets) I am not actually arguing if it would be legally possible today, I am merely stating that...

So we are not all equal under the law? Why cannot they avoid wearing a hard hat on a big construction site?

I am not talking about dumb school rules. I am not much for religious accommodation to be honest with you. As for things like LEO uniform etc... I don't see a problem with providing a few options for head gear (until SWAT helmet time rolls around) that could be considered part of the standard...

Exactly. I have no belief system so I could NEVER get special consideration under the law? Not the way it should be IMO.

I have one, would consider selling, is he looking for new or used?

No religious group should be allowed to advocate for special consideration under the law. This is what I am trying to say. Laws apply to Canadians/British Columbians, NOT Xian, Jew, Muslim, Sikh, etc... Who are you to **** on my backyard beliefs ?

If they fight for this, they should fight for EVERYONE, not just their own little group. As a Canadian I could give a rats *** if anyone wears a helmet or not (the argument about shared health care is BS) so if you want to argue that it violates your religious rights, you should argue full stop...

I wish all that would go away, taxes would make a believer out of anyone...

I would have to agree. Wasn't lost on the website commenters though.

Try this as well, their mobile Android app is good as well. http://duckduckgo.com/ http://www.thestar.com/business/article/1155198--search-engine-duckduckgo-soars-on-un-google-like-privacy-policy

This is already the case in Ontario.

Chips, Dressing and Gravy close by!!! Holy FARK!

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2012/04/30/bc-motorcycle-helmet-law.html I wonder if they will revisit the exemption for Sikhs?