Search results

i wonder how many people here who are disparaging the institution of marriage would still turn around and deny that right to same sex couples. . .

your mother may be staying out of guilt, but she's also doing it to spite your father. as for who's the one generalizing, i can read the qualifiers used in your post and in mine to judge that. again, your parents' (and probably your) experience does not a society make.

+1 there are more bad cagers by sheer number, but by capita, riders probably win this one. . .

after reading that link, i'm going to say no, you probably don't want to see the guy's face. . .chewed from the top of the forehead down to the jaw??? that's totally messed up.

as a follower of cycling since the 1980s, i never thought this day would come. congratulations to ryder. . .you've done canada proud. . .

no question the sri lankan fraudster was a d-bag. never questioned that. but he's one of ours now, and as you know, there are plenty of far worse canadian citizens out there. calling for his 'deportation' when we are putting out the red carpet for a convicted british citizen is far worse. we...

i don't think you can extrapolate your parents' experience to all married couples and infer that the only reason they don't divorce is because they choose to stay married. if they truly tried to make it work, and are still miserable after 40 years, then by all means get a divorce, they...

i think many people who get divorced don't take the whole marriage thing seriously enough. i'm not speaking of people who suffer abuse (psychological or physical)--they need to get out of the relationship, stat--but about those who think marriage doesn't take effort or work. . .those who got...

+1, agreed.

pfft, whatever. your insults were worth the thought that you put into them. . .nothing, and meant about as much to me. it was the admin team that insisted that infractions had to be handed out for that thread. rich people don't need to try to brag about themselves on internet forums, as...

if the relative attractiveness of the spouses, years down the road, is the reasoning for either getting married or not getting married, then don't get married. marriage has to be a lot more than just physical attraction.

if you weren't lying, then you are just ignorant of the actual charges that black was convicted of. fair enough. cast not the first stone and life gets a lot simpler. . .if you are mature enough to do that (probably not, as your posts consistently attest).

you got banned because you aren't mature enough to have a discussion without resorting to insults. some ignorant person here claimed black was only guilty of obstruction. that person was flat out wrong and were LYING when they claimed otherwise. learn to read properly, you're not psychic, and...

actually, you should try reading my first post again. i'm not suggesting equivalency. . .i suggested black was worse than our sri lankan friend.

mark kipnis, following the same ruling that quashed two of black's fraud convictions is no longer 'a criminal' as you put it, and his life was ruined by black. try reading up on him, since according you, once someone is a criminal, they cease to have 'lives' that you care about, lol. . .don't...

kids are great for most people, but i've seen my share of real d-bags who should never have pro-created. for every solid parent like yourself, there's a nightmare waiting to happen. . . .we can only hope for everyone's sake they're smart enough not to have children.

mark kipnis. read up on him.

so, if by your own admission there were lives ruined, then by 'discount[ing]' them that invalidates them, how does that change the fact that lives were ruined? lol, if you want to draw your arguments in such tautological ways, then sure, you'll be correct every time. congratulations. btw, if...

http://financialpostbusiness.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/black-cta7-remand.pdf have a gander through that ruling. this is what i base my claim on. . .they were guilty, until the supreme court moved the goalposts on them (which should have overturned a slew of previous convictions of other...

those are facts. is he a convicted thief? yes. did millions of dollars get stolen from shareholders in the form of non-compete fees that went in his and his buddies' pockets instead of back to the company where they should have? yes. were lives ruined? yes. what exactly have i amplified?