Search results

The interview is to try and figure out what happened, its part of an investigation. If there are reasonable grounds you are arrested, either with or without an interview. No different, either way. Not sure what you are referring to with hiding behind the union.

All good Tom, my post wasn't meant to be directed at you.

The public gets the exact same comforts if they are not arrested and only being interviewed. You are comparing being arrested and being questioned....two different things.

Involved in a serious incident facing charges, would you speak to a lawyer??

Thought I would point this part out, one more time.... Once the SIU investigation is done, a report outlining all the evidence etc, is forwarded to the director, Ian Scott, who reviews everything and makes the decision as whether or not there are reasonable grounds to believe a criminal...

Wuts the problem and how do you suggest they fix it??

How SIU basically works.... well you could read their website for starters.... SIU investigates incidents along side the investigating police service. It is called a parallel organization. And the police service has to assist or do whatever SIU basically asks. Once the SIU investigation...

The VAST majority of SIU investigators are former police officers. Where else would you find the skill sets needed to do such investigations??? A lawyer prolly could, perhaps a traffic engineer of some sort. Forensic specialists maybe.... But all of them make much more money doing what...

What exactly are you pointing out???? It sounds like he was charged and released.....so?????

Someone riding a motorbike down Yonge Street with a handgun shooting at people....yup, I'm gonna run him down. Dude fleeing from police on a bike, just shot someone and it is believed he is going to shoot someone else (think of a domestic situation)....yup, ramming him too. Again, anywhere...

Bingo..... The use of lethal force when justified is not limited to the options on a cops belt. Do what you gotta do to get the job done. Firestart....it pains me to think we are actually agreeing on a few things!!!!:D

yup I would say a person more than people though...

IF you were involved in an incident where someone was killed (or any other incident for that matter) and the police could be looking at you as a suspect, what would you do???? In all likelihood, you would speak to a lawyer and take his advice, which would be to not say anything. EVERYONE in...

I guarantee it has happened, and in some cases justified and warranted. Unfortunately, you are correct on the other. Numerous times daily.

Absolutely, I mentioned that a couple times previously. There would likely be damage and definitely DNA substance. It's possible the cruiser did strike her, but again, it is an SIU investigation and they seldom release any info.

Well if was released with no charges, there is no reason to be put before a judge. If a person is charged they either need to be in front of a justice within 24 hours or released with a court date, ie promise to appear or appearance notice. They likely interviewed him then forwarded the...

Actually it's not. In domestic situations, if there are RG's to believe an offence has been committed, the police SHALL lay charges. In non-domestic situations, the police MAY lay charges. If the victim of the threats does not want charges, police do not have to lay them.

Statements like that are with humour. If the uninformed would take a minute and read a bit, they would quickly become informed and understand how absurd that statement I made is. It's got nothing to do with emotions. Actually I guess it does, I am laughing at some levels of thought on here...

It is SIU that is investigating this, as far as the cops involvement. But I guess maybe the cop could have hit her and then just cruised on over to the car wash and sprayed, the blood, guts and hair off his car. "Hey SIU man, I washed my car all up for you, here it is now for you to seize...

I am talking about an initial appearance. You cannot be held in custody for longer than 24 hours without being put in front of a justice, at which time means you are formally charged. If I recall correctly ( and I may not be ) the AG was arrested and charged quite quickly.