Lol, local man rides 1000. Read all about it!
Really? Never heard of him.
And for everyone else that isn't in this MotoGP thing I guess we'll have to deal with converted litre bikes. Ever ridden one?
Nm I just quickly scanned the posts, your one of the people that's never ridden a 1000 but has somehow formed an opinion of what it's like to. I'm assuming me saying 600's are slow struck a cord as that's the fastest bike you've ever ridden and it's power scares you. It's alright, big boy bikes aren't for everyone.
Really? Never heard of him.
And for everyone else that isn't in this MotoGP thing I guess we'll have to deal with converted litre bikes. Ever ridden one?
Nm I just quickly scanned the posts, your one of the people that's never ridden a 1000 but has somehow formed an opinion of what it's like to. I'm assuming me saying 600's are slow struck a cord as that's the fastest bike you've ever ridden and it's power scares you. It's alright, big boy bikes aren't for everyone.
Hahaha
Reply of the day right there lol
A lot of it has to do with the actual rotational mass inside the engine as apposed to the physical weight. A 600 will turn in easier but it doesn't mean it turns "better".
Want to talk rotating mass look at some of the best turning bikes - Buell XB series
Ya and how are the motors placed in the frame???
Go ride a 1000 I4 and then report back.
Slow? What a coincidence, Valentino Rossi said that about converted street bikes. He rides MotoGP.
Lol, local man rides 1000. Read all about it!
No.
And wtf are you two going on about?
No, I meant to quote you. The point I'm trying to make is that, like racing on the track, street riding is mostly a sport and hobby. Yes, litre bikes have a certain type of power and provide a certain experience. I can see why people would be fully in favour of them. But there are many ways to do the hobby even just in the realm of performance street riding. Have you noticed the overwhelming enthusiasm for RC390 yet nobody's ridden one yet or compared it to something much faster? And don't get me started on the weirdos running CBR125s.
I'm not the "house 100" superstar", I know who Rossi is, and ya you could read about me riding my 1000.
A 1000SS is a class of bike, a 600SS is a class of bike, a 250/300 is a class of bike etc Have you seen the myriad of road race classes? Is Moto 3 bogus? Moto 2?
Racing on a track for a prize. Which has absolutely zero to do with the question presented here.
I knew that was going to be the response. So I guess a 1000SS must be the only bike to ride on the street then because not race? Anything else is wasting your time? Anything else is not getting full pop? Every class has it's own unique purpose and feel and experience. "who in there right mind would buy anything smaller is beyond me" per Road Warrior, man that is limiting.
Since my personal choice of bike is a literbike, and all I've done is defend the choice of those who have solid reasons to ride a smaller bike, exactly what is your end game in quoting me? I seriously don't understand.
I was replying to your sarcastic posts.
I did race a 600 for a season after I'd been on a 1000 race bike. They're slow on the track too.
Got a quick question for you. You're still young at 31, so that race you were in was amatuer superbike I assume. Any thought of taking it further?
yup over 30.if your over 30, have a look at all state, clean record, $780/year w/ comp for a VFR 1200, the 1000RR was only a couple bucks cheaper. This is in waterloo, not the GTA though