Man charged for not giving phone password | Page 4 | GTAMotorcycle.com

Man charged for not giving phone password

What the hell do you guys have to hide. I get the whole personal space thing but as you can see on the news even Canadians can't be trusted

Do you have curtains or blinds on your window? Do you keep the doors to your home open?
 
I don't like that these kind of things are happening, but I wonder if the best way to counter-act it is act like you don't care at all.

Since this guy caused a fuss, no doubt they will go through every directory on his phone and check everything.

If he said "Password? I don't need no stinking password" and tossed the phone to them unlocked they'd probably barely even look at it.

I also don't know what they are hoping to find. If I was doing anything criminal or planning anything criminal, I would certainly be using a disposable phone and would not be crossing borders with it -- so essentially CBSA is either just annoying the innocent or possibly catching the dumbest of the dumb with this routine.
 
I also don't know what they are hoping to find.

Perhaps child pornography:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-ke...counters-in-dominican-republic_b_5678448.html

When we were in Cuba we saw a lot of Canadian tourists, specifically Quebecois because they are able to speak Spanish more easily than Anglophones, that were engaged in the local sex tourism industry with minors. We were in one cafe and a guy from Quebec was talking to us, he must have been 70 years old. He was showing off his "girlfriend" to us, she looked like she was no more than 15.

Again, just speculating. Innocent before proven guilty. And it doesn't change the fact that our privacy as CDN citizens is being infringed upon by our own government.
 
What the hell do you guys have to hide. I get the whole personal space thing but as you can see on the news even Canadians can't be trusted

Maybe I'm over reacting and it's unrealistic for me to think that a CBSA guard would ever demand to see the contents of my work phone or laptop.... but I'm not allowed to show people the contents if they don't have proper authorization.
 
Canadian's were probably complaining back in the 1940's about their suitcases being searched.

It's the new world, instead of luggage now it's electronic devices.

Were the CSBA agents just out fishing, or did they single out this guy for a good reason? As Lightcycle speculated maybe he was doing some things on his vacation that he shouldn't have been doing....

If you want your personal privacy to remain private then leave your phone and laptop at home. I'm flying to Jamaica Sunday, bringing my laptop and cell phone with me, ain't got nothing to hide and i'm fully aware that to travel in and out of Canada my belongings are subjected to a search.
 
Last edited:
Yeah guys bend over and take it like good little Canadians.
 
Its a computer with all your personal information on it bro.

Welcome to 2015. The law needs to be adjusted and kept up to date for changing technologies. There's only so much information that the "1940's suitcase" can hold.


ps. this isn't about the device, it's about the CBSA forcing you into helping incriminate yourself
 
I saw this earlier and it definitely concerns me.

Occasionally I cross the border for work and my work laptop and work phone have ITAR and/or controlled goods documents on them. In the past I've been told that CBSA agents are not cleared to view any information on my phone or laptop. Both are password are protected, and I have been told that if requested I can boot up either device and show them the log in screen. I can show them that the device is functional but I am not to proceed any further. ITAR and CG regulations prohibit me from sharing the information on my phone or laptop with people who do not have proper clearance.

I would not permit CBSA agents to view the contents of my phone/laptop.

You should read the case law already established in R v Leask... They don't need permission however if their is reasonable grounds they will take the device and it may be years before you see it again.
 
You should read the case law already established in R v Leask... They don't need permission however if their is reasonable grounds they will take the device and it may be years before you see it again.

They don't need permission to take the device, but they certainly would need a password to view its contents... the question this topic poses is whether or not their request for the password is lawful. Can I go to prison for not supplying the password?

This new case will help answer that question.


edit: the way R v Leask reads, his computer wasn't password protected, so it doesn't apply to this discussion
http://caselaw.canada.globe24h.com/...stice/2008/01/18/r-v-leask-2008-oncj-25.shtml
 
Last edited:
The point is they can take the device and have it forensically looked at and the device is now gone for however long that takes. I know what the point of the case is, that aspect of it will be interesting to to watch, however my response was to caboose who said he wouldn't "permit" CBSA.

This thread is riddled with so much false, inaccurate and tin-foil hat paranoia it's kinda mind boggling to read. CBSA isn't interested in looking at people's devices for ***** and giggles and petty porn we all watch. They are looking for criminality. IE CHILD PORN, now knowing that all you yahoos with really nothing to hide suddenly going through with secret drives, and wiped phones...what do you think that accomplishes at the end of the day? I tell you what a waste of time money and resources spent on stupidity.

Since the majority of you are men, do you normally hang out outside female washrooms or elementary schools looking all sketch? Cuz really that sort of the negative attention one draws to them self when they start going overboard with the things like wiped phones and secret drives...you think you are being smart but all it does is raises the suspicion that there is something there to hide.
 
^ finally the voice of reason. I was hoping you would come along :)
 
The point is they can take the device and have it forensically looked at and the device is now gone for however long that takes. I know what the point of the case is, that aspect of it will be interesting to to watch, however my response was to caboose who said he wouldn't "permit" CBSA.

The problem is that caboose is not allowed to permit CBSA to do that search.

Government department #1, thou shalt keep these documents secret.
Government department #2, thou shalt inspect.

Who wins?
 
Its a computer with all your personal information on it bro.

Welcome to 2015. The law needs to be adjusted and kept up to date for changing technologies. There's only so much information that the "1940's suitcase" can hold.


ps. this isn't about the device, it's about the CBSA forcing you into helping incriminate yourself

They sell $10 pay as you go phones down at the 7-11 if you are that paranoid about the CSBA rummaging through your phone and finding your pron. "Incriminating yourself" lol.
 

Back
Top Bottom