That's the problem nowadays, people don't seem to be able to see both sides of the situation. Even after the fact.
The start of the video shows a Supersport bike sharing the lane with the Jeep. To my inexperienced eye, he's being forced to the side and slowed to a stop by what appears to be two other members of the public. Not exactly what you'd expect for good public relations, by the ride's sponsors. However, I will repeat, we have no idea how the situation escalated to this point. I can't just automatically assume that one side is right, and the other wrong without seeing all of the facts, in the way that the videographer can.
Sure the motorcyclists want him to stay the ... away, but he also want to get the ... out of their way.
It looks to me from the video that the supersport that was recording was within inches of the Jeep and forcing him into the curb. Hardly non-aggressive. The other motorcyclist stopped his bike in the middle of the road for no apparent reason. Are you suggesting that there were ducks crossing the road? Besides, wasn't that woman thrown in jail for stopping?
Here, depending on who initiated things, there could be vehicle confiscation and 172 charges, for one, the other or all of the direct participants.
Anyways, I still don't see enough evidence one way or the other to really pick a side, even with the video which is obviously biased against the jeep driver. I'm not sure what this group intends to prove by publishing this video, except that they and other vehicles can't get along. It takes away from whatever the event was supposed to be for, and focuses it on the we vs them mentality that exists. Maybe their city will decide to cancel the event, and save everyone some hassle.