2010 SE is the loaded version with ABS and the touring luggage.
I'm keeping the Burgman but I would like the extra power the Vstrom provides and the extra range.
Also the Burgman eats tires. Goes with the turf.
The Vstrom will be in between the ST1100 and the KLR 650 as far as top heavy goes and I likely would opt for a Sargent seat tho the one on it looks good.
I sold the ST1100 so have half the cost of that Wee available.
If it's still there I might go up when I get back.
I suspect many would not like the white and I'm fine with it. Knowing the dealer they stole it for a song.
A number of the Burgman riders in the US see the Wee as the "other bike".
Will give me light off pavement, longer riding range, longer tire life, MUCH better suspension, more power.
I can also strip off the luggage for a lighter ride
I give up shaft drive and effortless riding..roll and go.., weather protection, heated grips, power screen and very low CogG, superb lights and brakes and excellent storage.
Step through is and was meaningless. Saving my clutch hand was the primary purpose. I do like braking with both hands but either way is fine
AFAIK both are very reliable.
With a smaller front the Wee should get better mileage.
The Burgman with it's huge front sucks fuel once you hit 120 or so - I'd love to do 400 km on a single fuel up.
••
http://www.topspeed.com/motorcycles...2010-suzuki-v-strom-650-abs-ar66386.html#main
Looks like the Bark Busters and a few other bits are after market.
Some might shy off the mileage but does not bother me.
http://www.sargentcycle.com/Seats-Accessories/Suzuki-VStrom-2002-11-Reg-No-Heat/
The Sargent is amazing on the KLR so would think even better on the Wee