Unfortunately the article didn't at all focus on motorcycle industry as a whole but only on CRUISER (and to a much lesser extent touring) lines of select five. No, these lines can't rebound if only because they are by large technologically obsolete.
Eventually people are going to realize that engine rattling, performance-hindering rake angles and all sorts of 'vintage' design traits (err shortcomings) don't belong in modern machine. Then, finally, the entire segment will perish... Cruiser riders will be relegated to junk-yards and niche brands for a truly 'vintage' experience (which is what they seek by shunning modern tourers and designs, right?_.
If the car industry showed the same maddening resistance to progress, we'd still be seeing Model T Fords around... ...Hey remember the 'liberating and character-full' feel of wooden wheels? Lets put those on a CBR! Great idea!
(now i'm going to hide from the inevitable backlash of cruiser-riders...)
PS: To address the article's point about reduction in sales/production of higher displacement models (touring, cruising, whatever...) consider the power output modern 600cc engines/powerplants... Efficiencies and improvements in engine design/technology allowed a modern 600CC super-sport offer power/performance that a 1L power plant designed some 20 years ago. No wonder people are considering cheaper, more efficient lower displacement models.
Anecdote: I recall a 40+ rider that showed up to one of the Fuzzy rides years ago, one day fresh on his new CBR. After the 80 or so clicks we put on during the ride, he pulls off his helmet to reveal an ear-to-ear smile. His only remark was: "I can't believe I wasted 20 years upgrading and boring out Harley and cruiser engines... ...I should have just bought one of these years ago!" ...Now apply that to a sport tourer.
</end rant>
Bookmarks