|
|
|
Public Inquiry? Nothing to see here
- Thread starter justride
- Start date
And the taxpayer picks up the tab for how many millions?
That’s pretty much what happens when you let the Bank of Canada print money without having the gold reserves to back up the amount of money your putting into circulation, if you want an idea of where this will go if he isn’t stopped; just look at Venezuela (the first country where the Soros backed Dominion Voting machines where used).
Last edited:
Oh look a rabbit hole......
Got a spare $787.5M laying around?
FTFY
But you said you want to have a conversation?
Last edited:
Using Soros is the 21st Century version of mentioning Hitler in a 90s thread.
I could not agree more, I was asking about the money because my good buddy Rupert is looking for $787.5M (USD) as a fallout of his companies baseless accusations and attacks. Can anyone help him out? Apparently some of his staff had to be cut.
Mad Mike
Well-known member
I doubt Murdoch lost a moments sleep over the award money... the embarrassment would gave been more painful.
The staff cuts were vengeance... something that helps powerful people feel better.
Don't worry too much about poor Rupert, he'll be just fine.
Not sure how this drifted down to the U.S.
That seems to happen frequently with the current Canadian administration.
If we're going there, they would have had a public inquiry, and possibly a special prosecutor, heads would roll.
As far as Poilievre and the "veil of ignorance", does Trudeau not see the irony in his statement?
Claiming that he and his ministers were under a "veil of ignorance" regarding what was going on, and passing the buck to the civil servants.
The people in charge of looking at top secret documents, don't get those documents, and say nothing & collect salary for ten years or so? WTF?
You also can't simply declare that electing six or eight more conservatives wouldn't change things for the better.
As far as Bitcoin, what I heard PP say was that it could be used as a hedge for the dollar, not a replacement. It was shown that it might not be a very good hedge when it cratered after COVID concerns "ended". The white supremacist accusation, I have no idea. Was that from the protest? Was someone thinking that truck drivers are white supremacists? I know some would like to picture us having the division they have in the U.S., but I haven't seen it. I went down once and took a look. More of the critics should have done the same. Are the leaders still in jail awaiting trial?
That seems to happen frequently with the current Canadian administration.
If we're going there, they would have had a public inquiry, and possibly a special prosecutor, heads would roll.
As far as Poilievre and the "veil of ignorance", does Trudeau not see the irony in his statement?
Claiming that he and his ministers were under a "veil of ignorance" regarding what was going on, and passing the buck to the civil servants.
The people in charge of looking at top secret documents, don't get those documents, and say nothing & collect salary for ten years or so? WTF?
You also can't simply declare that electing six or eight more conservatives wouldn't change things for the better.
As far as Bitcoin, what I heard PP say was that it could be used as a hedge for the dollar, not a replacement. It was shown that it might not be a very good hedge when it cratered after COVID concerns "ended". The white supremacist accusation, I have no idea. Was that from the protest? Was someone thinking that truck drivers are white supremacists? I know some would like to picture us having the division they have in the U.S., but I haven't seen it. I went down once and took a look. More of the critics should have done the same. Are the leaders still in jail awaiting trial?
Wanker. The house of elected representatives voted me out but my pal JT wants me to be here. Of course I'm staying to deliver my "unbiased" opinions.
His theoretical impartiality and honor are quickly circling the drain.
www.cp24.com
His theoretical impartiality and honor are quickly circling the drain.
Johnston plans to keep special rapporteur role, as House of Commons votes for him to step aside
David Johnston said his mandate to probe allegations of foreign interference comes from the government and not the House of Commons, after members of Parliament voted in favour of his ouster on Wednesday.
www.cp24.com
|
|
|
|
|