How are you guys finding affordable insurace? | Page 4 | GTAMotorcycle.com

How are you guys finding affordable insurace?

accident benefits is your answer. You crash the car even a bad one you can usually walk away unhurt. You crash a bike even a minor one you usually are hurt and need rehab, lost income replacement etc etc.
that is why it's cheaper for you to insure 2 cars instead of one bike. Do some research.

Thanks tips...I actually have done research and understand that accident benefits make up the majority of our rates...but make whatever assumptions you want. I have no problems paying what my insurance costs +/- 150 per month, but for the actual riding season. When the rate equals 300 +/- per month for actual riding time, that seems ridiculous to me.
 
Thanks tips...I actually have done research and understand that accident benefits make up the majority of our rates...but make whatever assumptions you want. I have no problems paying what my insurance costs +/- 150 per month, but for the actual riding season. When the rate equals 300 +/- per month for actual riding time, that seems ridiculous to me.

So again I ask. Tell me the price you don't deem ridiculous and show the data how you came to the price you deem reasonable.
 
I have no problems paying what my insurance costs +/- 150 per month, but for the actual riding season. When the rate equals 300 +/- per month for actual riding time, that seems ridiculous to me.

Quoted the above since you missed it the first time around.

You work in insurance don't you?
 
Fine they pass a law that you can't sue. Would you like that law applied to you as well if you were the victim of an uninsured person who hits you? Are you willing to just absorb any costs that won't be covered by your policy or are you willing to pay higher premiums for the uninsured motorist coverage on your policy? It doesn't just come for free all these great ideas


I misunderstood the original post. Was not thinking of it from that point of view. I agree with what you are saying.
Only on my first coffee ?. My mistake.
 
Quoted the above since you missed it the first time around.

You work in insurance don't you?
He's asking you how you came up with the number you're willing to pay. In casr you missed it.
 
Quoted the above since you missed it the first time around.

You work in insurance don't you?

I asked for the back up data to show the price you like is the price it should be. I can pull numbers out of the air too. I'm not only The president but I'm also a client ( hopefully that doesn't go over your head)
 
Touché, I actually did miss the data request....another coffee please.

Since I am not an actuary, I have no idea how they even come up with the numbers aside from appearing to grab from thin air since you can get rates significantly different depending on insurer.
 
Last edited:
Touché, I actually did miss the data request....another coffee please.

Since I am not an actuary, I have no idea how they even come up with the numbers aside from appearing to grab from thin air since you can get rates significantly different depending on insurer.

i think this is the most reasonable insurance conversation ever to happen in the history of insurance conversations. Progress is being made!
sometimes the rates you are quoted change when you bind, sometimes you get discounts from one company that another is not willing to offer due to their experience in that segment. Each company has a suite of products and appetites that range from the vehicle you have to the value of your house , your age and where you live. Add that all up and throw in your driving record , now add in limits and deductibles and that's a real simple way to explain how prices are reached. Then they have to be approved by FSCO whether they want to increase or decrease rates
 
Last edited:
I can understand that. Insurers seem to usually say that data and demographics are what determine rates, so then logic would say that all companies should be fairly equal in terms of their rates. But that is hardly the case...hell I got quotes ranging from 1500/yr to 4000/yr when I was calling around last year.
 
I can understand that. Insurers seem to usually say that data and demographics are what determine rates, so then logic would say that all companies should be fairly equal in terms of their rates. But that is hardly the case...hell I got quotes ranging from 1500/yr to 4000/yr when I was calling around last year.

many times its brokers making mistakes in quoting , like applying discounts you don't deserve because they are unaware , make a mistake or are trying to hook the sale. As I stated before it's also the appetite of the company. Some companies might say sure we will insure motorcycles if someone wants to pay 4 grand because that is our price point. Others might say we are willing to go lower and in this case they usually require your house and cars within 1 year to be insured by them as well. If that doesn't happen then you get a huge increase . Why does a burger cost 99 cents at McDonald's and 10 bucks or whatever at burgers priest. Ingredients, quality, brand and service. And to go further on that ,insurance is the only product where when you sell it you have no idea what it's going to cost you. If I sell a burger I can quantify the cost of material and labor, if I sell an insurance Policy I have no idea what that policy is going to cost the company. Can you imagine running a business that once the customer leaves you have no idea if the money they gave you will even let you break even on that sale or could cost you 100's or thousands of times the money that came from that sale???
 
There should be multi vehicle discounts...but when a company discounts your MC insurance while bringing over two vehicles and yet it equals the same amount as keeping them with separate companies, that makes no sense. Ideally they would look at a case by case scenario. For instance commuting back and forth from Barrie to Toronto everyday, I rack up well over 50k km a year just commuting (a good chunk of that being on the bike) but have an immaculate driving record with no accidents or moving violations. Why then am I able to insure two cars for the same price as one bike [29 and have been driving since 16, insured on my own since 18]...and keep in mind, if you want the realistic numbers, take your yearly amount and divide by 6 (not 12) since we rarely get any riding in from Nov/Dec until April/May.

Just my 2 cents.

Just curious, is your policy/insurer aware of the yearly mileage you rack up and is your policy based on that?
 
insurance is the only product where when you sell it you have no idea what it's going to cost you. If I sell a burger I can quantify the cost of material and labor, if I sell an insurance Policy I have no idea what that policy is going to cost the company. Can you imagine running a business that once the customer leaves you have no idea if the money they gave you will even let you break even on that sale or could cost you 100's or thousands of times the money that came from that sale???

Wow. Yeah that's a huge risk, didn't ever think of it that way
 
Yes and no, I didn't state anything unrealistic like 50km a month last year when I started but also didn't see myself commuting on the bike nearly as much this year as I ended up doing.
 
Last edited:
All I know is when I hear on the news that insurance is going up because insurance companies only made $2 billion profit instead of their projected $4 billion, they're over charging. Can't find anything mirroring those numbers anymore but that was all over the news a couple of years ago.

Then there are these articles saying we are overpaying:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/ont...or-auto-insurance-a-year-study-says-1.3028074
http://business.financialpost.com/n...o-4-billion-in-auto-insurance-new-study-finds
 
All I know is when I hear on the news that insurance is going up because insurance companies only made $2 billion profit instead of their projected $4 billion, they're over charging. Can't find anything mirroring those numbers anymore but that was all over the news a couple of years ago.

Then there are these articles saying we are overpaying:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/ont...or-auto-insurance-a-year-study-says-1.3028074
http://business.financialpost.com/n...o-4-billion-in-auto-insurance-new-study-finds


Study is BS because it didn't include all the insurance companies that had negative return on equity.

http://www.canadianunderwriter.ca/n...rs-with-negative-return-in-equity/1003567346/

all insurance companies financials are posted online, all Insurance companies have to file for rate increases or decreases on personal insurance and receive permission from FSCO based on their profitability.
Read up more than just the studies you like. And as far as profits would you like your insurer to be broke so when a claim happens they cant pay or would you like that they be profitable so they can pay claims???
 
Lol. Is there a clause for uninsured Mustache riders?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Back
Top Bottom