JTR
Well-known member
Glad the article cleared up the OP's misnomer. It isn't a CBR, it's a CB. I thought they had ruined CBR for a minute there.
Ninja 400 is insanely heavy though
You sure you're not thinking of the CBR500? That weighs 425-lbs wet, 55 more than and with around the same power as the N400.
Glad the article cleared up the OP's misnomer. It isn't a CBR, it's a CB. I thought they had ruined CBR for a minute there.
Still has a R in the name though. Wonder why?
can get the little Duke for that
would eat this thing alive
Agreed, but you're buying the quality and longevity of a Honda, not a KTM. I've heard bad things about KTM's small motors.People making suggestions about what’s right and wrong with the Honda are what’s right about the Duke.
373cc, 43bhp, 26lb-ft torque
328 dry, 13L tank, styling.
Just looks like the Duke’s weaker twin.
Might be a bit bias though.
USD forks, radial 4 piston brakes...super light weight...probably a decent chassis too..but disappointed in that engine, they've been milking it forever and a small single has no place on a full street bike
Especially when you can get a two cylinder ninja 400 for the same price...I imagine its quite light as well
Agreed, but you're buying the quality and longevity of a Honda, not a KTM. I've heard bad things about KTM's small motors.
RoadsterStill has a R in the name though. Wonder why?
can get the little Duke for that
would eat this thing alive
Oh YEAH ! I'd just wait until your ktm overheats. lol; my bad couldn't resist. the ktm's have a bad reputation for overheating...
apparently some machining in the head area can fix it...
the 300cb will never be in the same league as the ktm. you're correct.
It's nice, but where's the chrome?