-
-
Whose fault was it really?
-
Seems to me they were both riding beyond their abilities in the end. Cruiser guy that plowed into the camera guy must have been awfully close to loosing it himself to hit the camera guy who was just off the guardrail still at the moment of impact.
Would be an interesting discussion.
He was into the guardrail which slowed him down significantly, but might have saved it, if the other bloke hadn't run into the back of him.
Not really sure who you called a noob, and who a hooligan, though.
Rule one is, "don't hit the bike in front of you".
That's a noob mistake, and the guy in front didn't cause him to do it.
He managed it, completely on his own.
But the Hooligan was "In Superpsorts"!. That bike looked more like he was In Crusier, to me, or was In Superpsorts the name of the video clip? I'm so confused. So is Pegasus saying the first rider or the second rider caused the other to crash? To me nobody caused another person to crash, the second one crashed INTO the first.hmm, you're near 5k post, i'm just startin' to pick up on the lingo here, the hooligan is the first dude in the guardrail, a hooligan prob mainly cos of a look i'm guessing i think the "loud pipe folks/crowd" refers to hardleys
But the Hooligan was "In Superpsorts"!. That bike looked more like he was In Crusier, to me, or was In Superpsorts the name of the video clip? I'm so confused. So is Pegasus saying the first rider or the second rider caused the other to crash? To me nobody caused another person to crash, the second one crashed INTO the first.