|
|
|
CBC Sex-Ed Curriculum Debate
- Thread starter iFly55
- Start date
If you're going to keep posting movie length YouTube videos, can you at least provide an executive summary?
Pity that Jian couldn't have taken part in that one.
N3WMAN
Well-known member
I have to agree with iFly. Pure gold.
One ignorant retard arguing with zero fact against two fairly well informed blokes.
... Or he could learn about it at church.
Riceburner
Well-known member
Charles McVety from Canada Christian College shot himself in the foot. When ppl rely on metaphors to argue their case instead of fact and examples or erroneous examples they loose all credibility.
"we object to teachers encouraging kids to Masturbate and explore their bodies"
Translates to
"We want kids to be ashamed of touching themselfs" assumably due to Jesus..
Also the implied argument that because one of the writers of the curriculum was guilty of CP possessions that the curriculum is designed to Groom children for sex....crazy go nuts.
Translates to
"We want kids to be ashamed of touching themselfs" assumably due to Jesus..
Also the implied argument that because one of the writers of the curriculum was guilty of CP possessions that the curriculum is designed to Groom children for sex....crazy go nuts.
Last edited:
Riceburner
Well-known member
fundamentalists of any religon just seem off to me.
Riceburner
Well-known member
I'm a polite old man....
The unforseen consequences of the new curriculum will be an increase in religious private schooling. My wife is a special needs and ESL teacher and many of the immigrant kids that need some serious help are being pulled out of the special needs and ESL program by the parents because the religious private school won't take damaged kids. They will take a failing kid but not a kid with an IEP, even if it is only ESL. The parents applying to the relgious private schools entirely because of the new curriculum. This is a significant trend they are seeing in certain populations.
I am sure not all religious private schools are like this but they are for some.
The parents can opt out of these classes but that apparently is not good enough, or they do not understand.
I am sure not all religious private schools are like this but they are for some.
The parents can opt out of these classes but that apparently is not good enough, or they do not understand.
Riceburner
Well-known member
I think some are influenced by cherry picked "issues" or mis-represented (intentional or not) by their group "leaders".
They know but they are being told that the curriculum is designed to turn kids gay or trans or groom them for Rape by pedophiles. In their mind they are trying to save the nation.
Exactly
Do we forget what it's like to have your parents intervene on your behalf at school? That's not the kind of attention anyone wants. That's worse than being seen with your parents in public. Kind of a big deal at that age.
cbcanada
Banned
Here is the problem I have with the sex Ed curriculum. I will say I am against it but my real "beef" with it goes way past the contents and I think is of great importance to all of us.
The curriculum teaches "homosexual sex is a natural and moral act"
A school has no business or rights in teaching what it moral. Infact there is no place it in the health and science agenda of a school.... Teach the facts. That's it.
Morality is mostly taught in home. The vast majority of us teach our morals to our children daily.We impart these morals in an attempt to help him/her decipher all of the information they receive throughout their lifetime. The goal is that they rely on the morals you taught them to be able to respond to life accordingly.... It's based on our personal beliefs...
If we allow the school board to teach young children about what is "moral" and what is not. Under a school curriculum then This opens up a big can of worms.
I pretty much see this curriculum as the first step in human engineering
The school board can now form and shape human beings if they are allowed to teach subjects and ideas of morality
"If i was educated, I'd be a damn fool"
The curriculum teaches "homosexual sex is a natural and moral act"
A school has no business or rights in teaching what it moral. Infact there is no place it in the health and science agenda of a school.... Teach the facts. That's it.
Morality is mostly taught in home. The vast majority of us teach our morals to our children daily.We impart these morals in an attempt to help him/her decipher all of the information they receive throughout their lifetime. The goal is that they rely on the morals you taught them to be able to respond to life accordingly.... It's based on our personal beliefs...
If we allow the school board to teach young children about what is "moral" and what is not. Under a school curriculum then This opens up a big can of worms.
I pretty much see this curriculum as the first step in human engineering
The school board can now form and shape human beings if they are allowed to teach subjects and ideas of morality
"If i was educated, I'd be a damn fool"
But, many kids will be taught the morality of their bigoted parents in some cases. The sex Ed curriculum represents the cultural and moral norm of a country.
For example:
Not everyone believes that master bastion is normal and not amoral, but most do.
Not everyone believes that homosexuality is normal, natural, and not amoral, but most do.
Last edited:
|
|
|
|
|