EBR sales were what killed them.
Nobody wanted to take a risk on a bike that is that expensive from such a small company.
What would you have done? Spent just under $18K on the 1190RX or $19.5K on a base Panigale 1199?
Oh man that just made me laugh, Harley worried about someone tarnishing their name because of POOR DESIGN?Harley employs serious businessmen, they make money, they retain a >50% market share in the US, and all they ever got from Eric Buell was liabilities from poor design and erratic behaviour..
Oh man that just made me laugh, Harley worried about someone tarnishing their name because of POOR DESIGN?
Especially since the quality reputation of Harley Buell was awful, and two of the EBR media tests reported blowing oil and major issues during the testing. Fit and finish was no where near the competition.
The US motorcycle journalists have done their best to pump up Eric Buell, because they really want a US sportbike maker, but they felt betrayed for what he started selling when he was cut off from Harley.
Harley employs serious businessmen, they make money, they retain a >50% market share in the US, and all they ever got from Eric Buell was liabilities from poor design and erratic behaviour. Example: designing and selling the Blast, then insulting customers by posting videos of crushing unsold bikes. At one point, every Buell made had a recall for frame failures. Harley had enough of this "genius". Harley fired Buell for very good reasons.
His designs were just different to try and a distinguish the company, but most of the this innovation was not better, and in some cases, really bad ideas.
Eric Buell is damaged goods, he won't be back. Both at Harley and Hero he never ran the business, others did that, but they could not sell what he produced. This was especially true at the range that EBR trying target, which has very tough, outstanding, competition from Japan, England Germany and Italy. I'm sure Hero cut him off for good reasons.
Eric Buell is no John Bloor. American business needs to get way from the models of bullsh-t hype of their CEOs and start actually making better products, because the buying public in performance bikes sees through bullsh-t quickly.
Harley makes bikes good for what they do, and they are reasonably reliable and safe. You want to cruise or highway tour on straight US roads, they are fine, which is why they sell so well despite the costs. Plus Harley sells image and culture more than actual bikes, that doesn't work in performance bikes.
It has nothing to do with the name, it has to do with legal liabilities. This is #1 concern in doing business in the US.
Anyways, I wonder what is going to happen to the "one side only caliper design" supposedly it was giving great results in braking stability on corner entry.
Especially since the quality reputation of Harley Buell was awful, and two of the EBR media tests reported blowing oil and major issues during the testing. Fit and finish was no where near the competition.
The US motorcycle journalists have done their best to pump up Eric Buell, because they really want a US sportbike maker, but they felt betrayed for what he started selling when he was cut off from Harley.
Harley employs serious businessmen, they make money, they retain a >50% market share in the US, and all they ever got from Eric Buell was liabilities from poor design and erratic behaviour. Example: designing and selling the Blast, then insulting customers by posting videos of crushing unsold bikes. At one point, every Buell made had a recall for frame failures. Harley had enough of this "genius". Harley fired Buell for very good reasons.
His designs were just different to try and a distinguish the company, but most of the this innovation was not better, and in some cases, really bad ideas.
Eric Buell is damaged goods, he won't be back. Both at Harley and Hero he never ran the business, others did that, but they could not sell what he produced. This was especially true at the range that EBR trying target, which has very tough, outstanding, competition from Japan, England Germany and Italy. I'm sure Hero cut him off for good reasons.
Eric Buell is no John Bloor. American business needs to get way from the models of bullsh-t hype of their CEOs and start actually making better products, because the buying public in performance bikes sees through bullsh-t quickly.
Were there failures on the way? Absolutely.
Did he come up with some genius designs and forward thinking engineering? Absolutely
His whole operation felt like OCC to me. "Hey guys, ill randomly weld a piece here and one over here, bend this one and there we go a frame".... Why people praise his engineering and innovation abilities is beyond me. That ridiculous disc/caliper idea was just a "lets do something different and hope it works"... well it didnt and they stuck with it for waaaay too long. Every part of their bikes was shotty unrefined crap.
After the tubers the chassis design went even more extreme with short wheelbase, rake/trail etc. still using rubber mounted Sportster based engine. That was a make or break decision for the Buell company. You've got a bike style no typical HD rider wants and an engine no typical sport bike rider wants. As a consequence sales are low. It didn't have to be that way.