"His companies insurance said they aren't covering it because he was driving drunk. The city is making him pay for the bridge repairs too. His life is over."
The quote is in relation to the Skyway bridge truck wreck.
Personally, I don't care about the impaired driver, his company, HIS starving homeless children etc. This is what you get for DUI.
If I understand it correctly, the insurance catch is that one's insurance is invalid if the vehicle is being being used in a crime and DUI, in Canada, is a criminal offense. Does this mean the the victims of DUI incidents are stuck without compensation?
I'm not sure if the uninsured automobile coverage section of the insurance policy is mandatory.
Similarly, if your vehicle was stolen to be used in a getaway and crashes, could the owner be left holding the bag?
The quote is in relation to the Skyway bridge truck wreck.
Personally, I don't care about the impaired driver, his company, HIS starving homeless children etc. This is what you get for DUI.
If I understand it correctly, the insurance catch is that one's insurance is invalid if the vehicle is being being used in a crime and DUI, in Canada, is a criminal offense. Does this mean the the victims of DUI incidents are stuck without compensation?
I'm not sure if the uninsured automobile coverage section of the insurance policy is mandatory.
Similarly, if your vehicle was stolen to be used in a getaway and crashes, could the owner be left holding the bag?