|
|
You, for lane splitting.
Doesnt make the guy right either.
You, for lane splitting.
Doesnt make the guy right either.
油井緋色;1960245 said:I'm no lawyer, but wouldn't the camera allow pretty easy proving of the dude's intention to inflict harm?
Irrelevant when you were blatantly breaking the law by lane splitting.
油井緋色;1960251 said:Wait so you're allowed to inflict bodily harm on a motorcycle if they're lane splitting?
From your post it would appear that lane splitting makes intention to kill or hurt irrelevant.
How do you prove that they purposely open the door to inflict harm? The pov of the camera coming from behind the car will likely show nothing.
stop looking at it from only the perspective you want justified.
you'll keep circle jerking this until you get the replies you want.
here's a thought, don't lane split, and you won't have to deal with this hypothetical scenario. or if you do, hypothetically, lane split, stop recording stupid/illegal things.
In a hypothetical situation he couldve been opening the door to do something else (check an ajar door, or trunk or what not) and then got angry at you and gave the finger as you "endangered" him by lane splitting and damaged his beloved car. Possible injury of his leg getting caught between the motorcycle and the door. etc etc油井緋色;1960259 said:Angry face with middle finger plus "**** you" instead of a "OMG I'M SORRY" reaction? lol I don't know how well that would hold.
.
油井緋色;1960259 said:Angry face with middle finger plus "**** you" instead of a "OMG I'M SORRY" reaction? lol I don't know how well that would hold.
Hypothetical is hypothetical, no rider is stupid enough to split in Toronto when people, such as yourself, think lane splitting negates attempted murder or assault.
In a hypothetical situation he couldve been opening the door to do something else (check an ajar door, or trunk or what not) and then got angry at you and gave the finger as you "endangered" him by lane splitting and damaged his beloved car. Possible injury of his leg getting caught between the motorcycle and the door. etc etc
Nobody in the GTA expects to have a bike arrive out of nowhere in stopped traffic so why would he have to check/expect for someone who in his eyes would be breaking the law?
There are tons of ways to look at it.
Just playing the devil's advocate
Video, then thread
油井緋色;1960259 said:Angry face with middle finger plus "**** you" instead of a "OMG I'M SORRY" reaction? lol I don't know how well that would hold.
Hypothetical is hypothetical, no rider is stupid enough to split in Toronto when people, such as yourself, think lane splitting negates attempted murder or assault.
油井緋色;1960279 said:
油井緋色;1960279 said:That's actually a really good pov. Thanks for the insight.
|
|
|