|
lol dont see the point...... how about i make it simple for you.
under no circimstance is runnimg worth risking your life or the lives of others. Just pull over and deal with it.
can you see the point? or do I need to use a bigger font size? or do you need a pop up book ?
Morally Ambiguous (submissions welcome)
"Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth." - Oscar Wilde
My comment was in reference to you giving us an example of when someone ran and something bad happen, i know of many times when someone ran and nothing happened, so I don't see the point of you bringing up that example as for as many times as someone has got caught or hurt there are probably as many times when someone gets away with it, I guess you missed my point
Your point about not been worth it, that is for others to decide, not me - my decisions are my own and i do not ask for consultation of such things on a public forum
It is funny how people get so uptight about this topic, we are all just having a conversation about something, no need to get pissy or rude as we all agree that running is not a good idea, however that does not mean you will die if you do like your example implied because it happened once
thats the problem , someone runs, nothing happens, gets away with it 5 times even, then he kills someone.
but then again, this is gtam. party on.
He is simply providing information so that OTHERS can decide based on all the information....not just your side of the argument.
As far as I'm concerned...it was rude of you to disregard his statement as pointless just because you don't agree with it. Others reading this thread now have more information when making their decision.
If you're going to have a conversation - no need to get pissy or rude if someone post something contradicting your opinion.
"When you invite the whole world to your party, inevitably someone pees in the beer."
Visit Sponsors of GTAM!
As I have posted before - usually in those threads where people ask whether there are rules preventing cops from chasing.
the Criminal Code of Canada allows the police to use lethal force to stop people running away from them. - See Section 25.
ZX600 got pissy when i posted that before too.
This post does not provide any legal advice and readers should consult with their own lawyer for legal advice.
My side of the argument? I couldn't care two ***** about what you think Paul and what your opinion is, that is my side of the argument.
Now you made me get pissy!
he is providing information and so do I - two points of view, that is all. I wasn't the one that said and I quote "or do I need to use a bigger font size? or do you need a pop up book ?" so who is been rude here?
Move along, nothing to see here
The ban hammer is a coming.
www.thetoyhauler.ca
Inferno is the new GTAM P.I.M.P.
No...you were the one that posted "Don't see your point" after he was just providing information (contrary to your opinion).
It is funny how people get so uptight about this topic, we are all just having a conversation about something, no need to get pissy or rude as we all agree that running is not a good idea, however that does not mean you won't die or kill someone if you do like your example implied because it didn't happen to a couple of people you know.
LOL
"When you invite the whole world to your party, inevitably someone pees in the beer."
Visit Sponsors of GTAM!
Telling someone I don't see their point is rude? ok
Go back and read my posts, I explained why I responded that way, it was not a shot at him. You on the other hand, just read my post and came to conclusions without fully understanding, i get it, it is a zx600 post, you must be against it
You got me there... where is that damn sarcasm smiley
Bookmarks