Why are insurance quotes not based on at fault claim amounts? - Page 2



Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 31 of 31

Thread: Why are insurance quotes not based on at fault claim amounts?

  1. #21
    VifferFun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    West of Toronto
    Posts
    7,486

    Re: Why are insurance quotes not based on at fault claim amounts?

    Quote Originally Posted by Aslan View Post
    I remember thinking similar questions many moons ago after a 0% fault claim.

    The short answer is that your insurance rate has nothing to do with how much you have put in, or taken out of some mythical kitty in the past. The fact that you have made a claim, statistically speaking, says that you are more likely to make one in the future so you get packaged into a rate group with riskier/worse/whatever people.

    Sure, it sucks that rates can't be based on how defensively you drive, deep knowledge of traffic patterns, fitness, ability to heal, ability to minimize personal injury with cat like reflexes, instincts to reduce property damage during a collision, and so on and so forth... They just go with what they can see on paper. Of course, they also don't know much about the other party who may be involved in a theoretical future claim, just that it will more likely be in your territory, and statistically like past claims in that territory.

    Personally, I think anyone who has made a claim will learn from the experience and get better, but I'm probably just projecting.
    Well said
    I'm an Actuarial Analyst for a Major Canadian Insurance Company. I analyse claims patterns to determine overall rate changes, as well as relative premium differences by various risk characteristics (eg. age, experience, claims, convictions, usage, etc.)

    Unless it's private, please post insurance-related questions in the forum rather than sending me a PM.

    Current: 2001 Suzuki GSXR1000 (4th Season)
    Previous: 1996 Honda VFR750F (4 Seasons)
    Previous: 1998 Kawasaki Ninja EX250 (3 Seasons)

  2. #22

    Re: Why are insurance quotes not based on at fault claim amounts?

    Quote Originally Posted by murf View Post
    What countries have you got quotes for? Revrandy just came back from California and his insurance is cheaper in Ontario.

    As an Aside, I had an offer in Silicon Valkey last year (Palo Alto), you might want to check what rent costs there!! The average house price is $1.6 million.
    For quotes: was referring to JPN, TW, KR and China...though I'd NEVER live in China.

    As for the rent costs: I don't need to worry because I have a really nice family tree.

  3. #23
    Dresden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Mississauga
    Posts
    253

    Re: Why are insurance quotes not based on at fault claim amounts?

    Quote Originally Posted by VifferFun View Post
    Not sure what you're talking about -- that has nothing to do with fastar1's post.
    I was "+1" Fastar1 .. the rest was towards the OP.
    Never to be taken seriously. Ever.

  4. #24
    revrandy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    St. Mary's, ON (for now)
    Posts
    666

    Re: Why are insurance quotes not based on at fault claim amounts?

    Quote Originally Posted by murf View Post
    What countries have you got quotes for? Revrandy just came back from California and his insurance is cheaper in Ontario.
    That is correct. We were in Orange County and my insurance there was $200 a year more for the same bike, with less coverage. Here I have $1M coverage, there I only had $350K. My insurance in South Carolina was cheaper than Ontario, but only by $100 or so.

    Yes you can get $100/yr insurance in the U.S. but it is $15K coverage, no liability, no comp etc. Not really worth it.

  5. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    5,134

    Re: Why are insurance quotes not based on at fault claim amounts?

    Quote Originally Posted by Aslan View Post
    Sure, it sucks that rates can't be based on how defensively you drive, deep knowledge of traffic patterns, fitness, ability to heal, ability to minimize personal injury with cat like reflexes, instincts to reduce property damage during a collision, and so on and so forth... They just go with what they can see on paper.
    There is an alternative that uses analysis of your current driving patterns instead of just relying on your demographic and personal driving history. Of course that may work to the detriment of some here.

    http://www.moneysense.ca/2012/02/01/...ave-you-money/
    Last edited by turbodish; 04-21-2012 at 10:52 PM.

  6. #26

    Re: Why are insurance quotes not based on at fault claim amounts?

    Quote Originally Posted by 油井緋色 View Post
    For quotes: was referring to JPN, TW, KR and China...though I'd NEVER live in China.

    As for the rent costs: I don't need to worry because I have a really nice family tree.
    Maybe getting a quote for where you want to live may be more relevant? See Revrandys post above.
    Plus, it sounds like silicon Valley is going to be beating your door down with job offers and big $$, does insurance cost really matter?

  7. #27
    Nixel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Mississauga
    Posts
    307
    Quote Originally Posted by murf View Post
    Maybe getting a quote for where you want to live may be more relevant? See Revrandys post above.
    Plus, it sounds like silicon Valley is going to be beating your door down with job offers and big $$, does insurance cost really matter?
    He's got this heirloom spruce in the valley. No worries!

  8. #28

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Brampton
    Posts
    95

    Re: Why are insurance quotes not based on at fault claim amounts?

    Quote Originally Posted by revrandy View Post
    That is correct. We were in Orange County and my insurance there was $200 a year more for the same bike, with less coverage. Here I have $1M coverage, there I only had $350K. My insurance in South Carolina was cheaper than Ontario, but only by $100 or so.

    Yes you can get $100/yr insurance in the U.S. but it is $15K coverage, no liability, no comp etc. Not really worth it.
    Drivers in Ontario would happily pay for the absolute cheapest insurance, even if it meant getting something that's $100/yr with 15k coverage, we would see a line up of drivers opting out of Accident Benefits to save on premiums

    hell... if we were legally allowed to drive w/o insurance they would pick that option in a heartbeat

    in our pursuit to be stingy penny-pinchers we quickly loose sight of the bigger picture

  9. #29
    VifferFun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    West of Toronto
    Posts
    7,486

    Re: Why are insurance quotes not based on at fault claim amounts?

    Quote Originally Posted by iFly55 View Post
    Drivers in Ontario would happily pay for the absolute cheapest insurance, even if it meant getting something that's $100/yr with 15k coverage, we would see a line up of drivers opting out of Accident Benefits to save on premiums

    hell... if we were legally allowed to drive w/o insurance they would pick that option in a heartbeat

    in our pursuit to be stingy penny-pinchers we quickly loose sight of the bigger picture
    Suppose insurance wasn't mandatory in Ontario. What would happen? Well, suppose you forgo insurance and someone smokes your bike and seriously injures you with permanent damages that will cost about $750K in medical costs. You sue the at-fault uninsured operator who has about $25K in assets. You clean him out, win $25K, but are still $725K short. Where does this money come from? We can't just leave you to rot on the pavement. Do you suggest that your medical bills should be paid by the public (i.e. increasing taxes so that they public can afford to compensate auto injuries)?

    The financial responsibility laws are in place for very good reasons. I would not be on the road without these laws.
    I'm an Actuarial Analyst for a Major Canadian Insurance Company. I analyse claims patterns to determine overall rate changes, as well as relative premium differences by various risk characteristics (eg. age, experience, claims, convictions, usage, etc.)

    Unless it's private, please post insurance-related questions in the forum rather than sending me a PM.

    Current: 2001 Suzuki GSXR1000 (4th Season)
    Previous: 1996 Honda VFR750F (4 Seasons)
    Previous: 1998 Kawasaki Ninja EX250 (3 Seasons)

  10. #30
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    60

    Re: Why are insurance quotes not based on at fault claim amounts?

    Viffer Fun. In the State of Florida, Motorcycle insurance is not nescessary at all. Neither are helmets. You can buy a brand new bike of any make you want and need not insure it for the road. There are thousands of uninsured bikes down there. What happens is you sue the person who hit you. Lawyers are a dime a dozen and you spend most of the nite listening to their commercials on TV.

    Insurance companies cry that medical cost are high in Ontario. What a laugh, you should see what medical care cost in Florida are. Example, Last year I got bit by some insect in Florida and I had a major reaction to the venom. I went to the hospital and was there for four hours. Did not see a doctor but a nurse practicianer only. Went up and took a scan of some kind to check for blood cloths in my foot. Took blood test etc. For four hours in that hospital, my bill was just under four thousand dollars when the hospital gave it to me. I finally got just repayment from my medical insurance company I had. I was happier than thou to submit that bill to them. Made me feel good. Wonder what we would be paying if the insurance industry had to pay those rates for medical care here in Ontario after an injury happen in a car accident. They have bargain rates here but blow it out of proportion. Again, the general public does not know that and the industry will not tell them.

  11. #31

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Oakville
    Posts
    89

    Re: Why are insurance quotes not based on at fault claim amounts?

    They actually do pay large rates like that. Assessment costs are very high as are treatments. Treaments can last years which only increases cost. Those medical costs you paid in the US as the similar in Ontario, we have OHIP which pays for it.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •