With all due respect, he wasn't really given advice - you stated an opinion, and I stated an opinion.
There are dozens of studies on the 'Net (many quoted on GTAM older threads) that compare plastic helmets versus composites, etc. (e.g. there's a really lengthy article debunking the myths that SNELL is superior to DOT quoted a few times throughout GTAM threads). The end result of all these studies is that the material used in the outer shell has very little bearing on the helmet’s ability to absorb an impact. The impact is absorbed by the polystyrene inner liner, not the outer shell. If there was any truth to the difference in performance based on material, they would be probably be banned and not meet any of the world standards (e.g. my AGV is a plastic shell which meets and exceeds the European Union standards and the British Standards, along with being DOT approved - do I trust my noggin in there? Yuppers.)
I stand by my comment - if it's DOT approved, wear it with confidence and pride.
Bookmarks