Divorce / separation question

**eastcoast_gsx** · 03-22-2012, 02:38 PM

Originally Posted by invictus43

He may have the right to go back, but that doesn't mean he wants to. He doesn't forfeit his right to the house by not being there.

As I understand it, it makes it a hell of allot harder.... Isn't the old saying "possession is 9/10ths of the law"...

**OpenGambit** · 03-22-2012, 03:19 PM

Originally Posted by eastcoast_gsx

As I understand it, it makes it a hell of allot harder.... Isn't the old saying "possession is 9/10ths of the law"...

wrong.

**eastcoast_gsx** · 03-22-2012, 03:26 PM

Originally Posted by OpenGambit

wrong.

OK, enlighten us.

**OpenGambit** · 03-22-2012, 03:30 PM

Originally Posted by eastcoast_gsx

OK, enlighten us.

Maybe you can look things up before you talk instead.

**jeffjones** · 03-22-2012, 03:34 PM

Originally Posted by OpenGambit

Not retained.

Well Played.

**eastcoast_gsx** · 03-22-2012, 03:54 PM

Originally Posted by OpenGambit

Maybe you can look things up before you talk instead.

bla....

**funrider** · 03-22-2012, 04:13 PM

Criminal Code Section 430 (c) and (d) apply here.
<HGROUP id=h-116>Mischief

</HGROUP>

430. (1) Every one commits mischief who wilfully
- (a) destroys or damages property;
- (b) renders property dangerous, useless, inoperative or ineffective;
- (c) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with the lawful use, enjoyment or operation of property; or
- (d) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with any person in the lawful use, enjoyment or operation of property.
  
  Police will never ever enforce denial of lawful access to your own property if a woman locks you out of your own house. Your friend has the odds stacked against him immediately - becuase he has a penis.