Yup. HTA 172 is 'strict liability', because of the possible term of imprisonment, giving you the option of putting forth a defence of due diligence (I had to speed because the banjo-playing rednecks were going to violate me if they caught me).
It still has to be reasonable rob! lol...
This post does not provide any legal advice and readers should consult with their own lawyer for legal advice.
Bookmarks