Originally Posted by
OpenGambit
I don't see how it could construed the other way, perhaps you can explain.
But the way I see it is, impark is offering a unilateral contract, which is accepted by a driver upon entering the lot.
you can argue that a contract is not formed until the ticket is purchased but taht doesnt' make sense because they also argue that the violation ticket is contractually based, meaning there is a contract before you pay.
Negligence is a tort concept and not really applicable to contract law in this instance.
Bookmarks