my point is that Vellone doesn't deal with disclosure, nor does it say you can't request a stay without a notice of constitutional question. that is the opposite of what you said in your post...
Secondly, the point about precedental value is that the first case you quoted has the same precedental value as the 2nd case that you posted. but yet you use one to establish "magic" number, while treating the 2nd one differently. That is completely inconsistant. Either they are both good or neither of them are.
Bookmarks