motorcycle myth tested on mythbusters



Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25

Thread: motorcycle myth tested on mythbusters

  1. #1

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    G T A
    Posts
    978

    motorcycle myth tested on mythbusters

    season 9 episode 13,

    watching it now. it tests if bikes get better mileage than cars. i wonder what the results are. y'all should check it out

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    701

    Re: motorcycle myth tested on mythbusters

    Quote Originally Posted by SkyRider View Post
    season 9 episode 13,

    watching it now. it tests if bikes get better mileage than cars. i wonder what the results are. y'all should check it out
    that really depends on what bike vs what car

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    G T A
    Posts
    978

    Re: motorcycle myth tested on mythbusters

    just finished watching it. much to my surprise.

    they used 3 pairs of popular bikes and cars from 80s, 90s and 00s.

    overall bikes (600cc) burned less gas, produced less co2, but produced much more harmful gases like NOx and etc. up to 7000%.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Somewhere
    Posts
    825

    Re: motorcycle myth tested on mythbusters

    watching it now. it tests if bikes get better mileage than cars. i wonder what the results are. y'all should check it out

    -that really depends on what bike vs what car
    Bingo Homer, your a genius compared to the so called Mythbusters - I like them though, but this myth is retarded, way to many factors.

    Can you link the episode, searched youtube, came up but is blocked for some reason - multiple tries.
    Last edited by S500K; 09-28-2011 at 11:58 PM.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    G T A
    Posts
    978

    Re: motorcycle myth tested on mythbusters

    oh yeah the myth is actually about which is more environmentally friendly, not fuel economy alone.

  6. #6
    Splash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    on my Black 2005 Z750 in Durham
    Posts
    3,499

    Re: motorcycle myth tested on mythbusters

    Last edited by Splash; 09-29-2011 at 09:34 PM.
    "I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"

    01001001 00100111 01100100 00100000 01010010
    01100001 01110100 01101000 01100101 01110010
    00100000 01000010 01100101 00100000 01010010
    01101001 01100100 01101001 01101110 01100111


  7. #7
    CrazyKell's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,757

    Re: motorcycle myth tested on mythbusters

    I do not need to watch Mythbusters to know this.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Somewhere between Eden Mills/Guelph, Ontario and Toronto.
    Posts
    2,431

    Re: motorcycle myth tested on mythbusters

    My bike gets relatively decent fuel economy unless you compare to a 125 or 250 and it gets the same mileage as my last car. About twice both my current cars though. A 250 or 125 will beat most for sure. Even if they get better fuel economy though, their emissions are going to be a lot worse.
    2009 Candy Plasma Blue Ninja 650R (has a cup holder)|Mods: Passenger foot peg flip up cup holder; ER6N grab bars; Grab bar sliders; Woodcraft swingarm spools; '09 fairing vibe fix; Thick weather stripping under seat; SportBars; Ninja650Shop.com no-cut sliders.|Upcoming: Fork sliders; Extended swingarm spools; Bar-end mirrors; HIDs with projectors.
    1987 Red Porsche 944 N/A (no cup holder)|Stock.
    1997 Black SAAB 900 SE 2.0 Turbo (1 cup holder)|Stock.

  9. #9
    RockerGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Where the twisties never end
    Posts
    9,295

    Re: motorcycle myth tested on mythbusters

    There was an article about this on Sportrider or Cycleworld about this.

    I do get better mileage on my GSXR 750 than my 2.8L car.
    Mind you, my gsxr is engineered for speed not fuel economy
    Resident Loudmouth






  10. #10
    frekeyguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Brampton, ON
    Posts
    7,640

    Re: motorcycle myth tested on mythbusters

    Im sure my bike with no emission controls puts out a lot more harmful gases.....

  11. #11
    DemonPig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Clarkson
    Posts
    1,497

    Re: motorcycle myth tested on mythbusters

    Not much of a myth. Fuel consumption is generally available for most cars and bikes, and even if it wasn't I know that my bike burns roughly 5l/100km, my Continental - 12l and my F-150 about 17l. As for emissions, cars are regulated more, therefore no surprises.

    1999 Magna VF750C
    2001 SV650S
    1997 CBR900RR sold
    2005 ZZR-250 sold

  12. #12
    Splash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    on my Black 2005 Z750 in Durham
    Posts
    3,499

    Re: motorcycle myth tested on mythbusters

    Quote Originally Posted by DemonPig View Post
    Not much of a myth. Fuel consumption is generally available for most cars and bikes, and even if it wasn't I know that my bike burns roughly 5l/100km, my Continental - 12l and my F-150 about 17l. As for emissions, cars are regulated more, therefore no surprises.
    Obviously you didn't watch the show since the myth is "A motorcycle is better for the environment because it has better fuel economy".


    Spoiler alert: motorcycles sucks for the environment.
    "I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"

    01001001 00100111 01100100 00100000 01010010
    01100001 01110100 01101000 01100101 01110010
    00100000 01000010 01100101 00100000 01010010
    01101001 01100100 01101001 01101110 01100111


  13. #13

    Re: motorcycle myth tested on mythbusters

    My ZX10R gets worse gas mileage than my Ford Edge

  14. #14
    DemonPig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Clarkson
    Posts
    1,497

    Re: motorcycle myth tested on mythbusters

    Splash - no I didn't. I don't watch TV at all. Last time I had cable was 4 years ago. Was responding to what OP wrote: "it tests if bikes get better mileage than cars."

    1999 Magna VF750C
    2001 SV650S
    1997 CBR900RR sold
    2005 ZZR-250 sold

  15. #15
    psycho44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    2,326

    Re: motorcycle myth tested on mythbusters

    would be interesting to see what gets better mileage per person. A car loaded with 5 people or a single person on a motorcycle.

  16. #16

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Somewhere between Eden Mills/Guelph, Ontario and Toronto.
    Posts
    2,431

    Re: motorcycle myth tested on mythbusters

    Quote Originally Posted by psycho44 View Post
    would be interesting to see what gets better mileage per person. A car loaded with 5 people or a single person on a motorcycle.
    Considering there are many cars that get better gas mileage than most motorcycles. It would be the car.

    A CBR125 gets what, 99 MPG? That would mean in order for the car to lose it would have to get worse than 25 MPG which even my 23 year old car beats. Many small cars will do better than 40 MPG which is about what a 600cc bike gets. 60 MPG in a diesel or hybrid isn't unheard of (though a little more rare).
    2009 Candy Plasma Blue Ninja 650R (has a cup holder)|Mods: Passenger foot peg flip up cup holder; ER6N grab bars; Grab bar sliders; Woodcraft swingarm spools; '09 fairing vibe fix; Thick weather stripping under seat; SportBars; Ninja650Shop.com no-cut sliders.|Upcoming: Fork sliders; Extended swingarm spools; Bar-end mirrors; HIDs with projectors.
    1987 Red Porsche 944 N/A (no cup holder)|Stock.
    1997 Black SAAB 900 SE 2.0 Turbo (1 cup holder)|Stock.

  17. #17
    psycho44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    2,326

    Re: motorcycle myth tested on mythbusters

    exactly a motorbike is only better than solo driving a car which everyone does. I rode a 250cc from Toronto to Vancouver Island and back getting about 25km/L at 10k km both ways which works out to roughly $400. That does not include the motel cost since it's hard to sleep on your bike without someone waking you up to make sure you're ok. So it got me thinking did I save anymore than if I were to drive with 3 of my buddies in a car? A roundtrip greyhound ticket is $200 and a plane ticket is around $500. So the believe most people have that riding motorbikes saves more gas is only true if you drive your car solo. Of course there is no price tag on the experience of open air which is just priceless.

  18. #18
    Moderator Rob MacLennan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Brampton
    Posts
    17,138

    Re: motorcycle myth tested on mythbusters

    Better mileage and far worse emissions, as expected.
    Morally Ambiguous (submissions welcome)

    "Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth." - Oscar Wilde

  19. #19
    Myztyk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Mississauga
    Posts
    1,060

    Re: motorcycle myth tested on mythbusters

    This episode is on Discovery right now if anyone is interested.
    2007 VRSCDX Night Rod Special - aka. The Bike I wanted in the first place.
    2002 Honda Shadow 750 ACE

    Straight Pipes 4 life!

  20. #20

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Kingsway
    Posts
    826

    Re: motorcycle myth tested on mythbusters

    Simple, the bikes tested did not have a cat. All the cars did.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •