Ok, first of all Wikipedia is hardly an "official" source for info - anyone can submit articles and claim them as factual without supporting proof. Secondly, the claim of longest production run is dubious, considering that India didn't start manufacturing them until '56. The name might be the longest in use, but it's a real stretch to claim that the bike itself is. Someone tried to make a similar claim about Triumph on Wikipedia, too... again, not even close.
And as for your last comment... grow up.
Bookmarks