I wasn't running from the cops!!

[MassNutrition]

If you didn't see the cop, as you claim... How do you know he was wearing dark sunglasses?

I never said I didn't see the cop... as stated in my original first post, I said I didn't see him "signal me" to pull over...

When you were eventually pulled over, were you wearing your seat belt then?

Yes, I was. I slipped it on because I entering the highway... NOT because I saw the police.

[Rob MacLennan]

I never said I didn't see the cop... as stated in my original first post, I said I didn't see him "signal me" to pull over...

Yes, I was. I slipped it on because I entering the highway... NOT because I saw the police.

Unfortunately that doesn't matter much, as they can use it to show mens rea. You weren't wearing it when they attempted to stop you. You were when they did. The presumption will be that you intended to avoid officers at least long enough to don your seat belt. I wouldn't be so secure in this going away.

[DaveOke]

It was subsection (2)... and thanks for pointing out the $1000 to $10,000 fine again... I was already told and I'm still freaking out LOL.

I called the dudes at Redline. They asked for a DETAILED report of the event, and what the cop was wearing, and what his actions were. Because I stated he was wearing a black fur hat, black gloves, and black jacket, we NEVER made eye contact... because of his DARK SUNGLASSES. If he DID signal someone, I wouldn't even know if it was me or not. It's gonna get tossed...


...court date is March 15th. I'll keep you guys updated.

You might have a strong case!! Tell the judge that in the case of R. v. Koufax, it was proven that when wearing sunglasses you become completely invisible. There was a high profile case back in 1999 were the sunglasses rule was applied when Koufaxs son, Julian, was testifying.

This would make total sense to why you couldn't see the cop and you should be granted an aquital, as Sonny was during his trial.

[caboose483]

You might have a strong case!! Tell the judge that in the case of R. v. Koufax, it was proven that when wearing sunglasses you become completely invisible. There was a high profile case back in 1999 were the sunglasses rule was applied when Koufaxs son, Julian, was testifying.

This would make total sense to why you couldn't see the cop and you should be granted an aquital, as Sonny was during his trial.

uuhhh.. huhhhh..

lolz

[gixxer_flexx]

You might have a strong case!! Tell the judge that in the case of R. v. Koufax, it was proven that when wearing sunglasses you become completely invisible. There was a high profile case back in 1999 were the sunglasses rule was applied when Koufaxs son, Julian, was testifying.

This would make total sense to why you couldn't see the cop and you should be granted an aquital, as Sonny was during his trial.

so if im wearing sunglasses you cant see me? hmm interesting...

[DaveOke]

so if im wearing sunglasses you cant see me? hmm interesting...

Believe it!
It was an actual case that might help this guy
greatly but mileage may vary

Doubt though he'll get off the seatbelt charge
as the even though the cop was invisible the cop still
did see him. So another lesson to be learned:
don't wear sunglasses and ride. You'll be invisible.
You guys didn't know that?

[moto22]

Thanks for the responses so far guys. Keep them coming...

I feel better already. Like I said, I wasn't trying to flee, avoid, swerve, or speed to get away from this guy... I just plain ol' didn't see him. I'm not concerned about the seatbelt fine. I'm guilty of that, and will pay out what I deserve. It's the other charge I'm worried about...

Keep the advice coming. I'd like to hear more opinions/advice. Thanks!

Yea your good man, that will get tossed, just going to cost you a bit of money for Redline, but you do what you have to do, you know..

[moto22]

Unfortunately that doesn't matter much, as they can use it to show mens rea. You weren't wearing it when they attempted to stop you. You were when they did. The presumption will be that you intended to avoid officers at least long enough to don your seat belt. I wouldn't be so secure in this going away.

I wouldn't either, but if he go's Red line he should be good as far as a defence, competent people work there..

[Tom_TTP]

Gimme a call from the Number below, ill see what can my boss do for you. He is an Ex Cop, his name is Ed Blaha, he can give you a consult on the phone, guessing he should be in from 10-6PM Monday Feb 21 2010. Peace.

[MassNutrition]

I retained the services of a paralegal/ex-cop on Saturday. Cost me $420 so far. I don't have to show up for court March 15th now, as I will be represented. I'll keep you guys posted...

[MassNutrition]

Court was yesterday. My paralegal showed and set my trial date for Oct. 14th. I haven't had a chance to talk to him personally yet (I will tomorrow). I'll keep you guys posted...

[FiReSTaRT]

Good luck!

[MassNutrition]

Court was yesterday. My paralegal showed and set my trial date for Oct. 14th. I haven't had a chance to talk to him personally yet (I will tomorrow). I'll keep you guys posted...

Fast Forward: Today is Oct. 14th already!! I can't believe how fast 7 months has flown by. Trial is today folks... wish me luck. I'll keep you posted.

[promac]

I think the more serious charge is going to be a tough sell as long as you don't end up in circus court in front of the JP ringmaster. Make note of the officer's behaviour and conduct towards you. Good luck!

[HunGJaI]

Fast Forward: Today is Oct. 14th already!! I can't believe how fast 7 months has flown by. Trial is today folks... wish me luck. I'll keep you posted.

Guess your not sleeping much....posting almost at 4am...

Good Luck!

[promac]

After he was stopped... he saw the cop.

Great save!

[Prince-ALI]

Good luck dude

[2live&ride]

would love to see how it all works out in the end.
Good luck man.

[shiroikicker]

good luck man

[AllanR]

Good luck and let us know how it goes.